Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Sep;22(9):2529-37.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1460-6. Epub 2010 Oct 30.

The effect of PTH(1-84) or strontium ranelate on bone formation markers in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis: results of a randomized, open-label clinical trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The effect of PTH(1-84) or strontium ranelate on bone formation markers in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis: results of a randomized, open-label clinical trial

J M Quesada-Gómez et al. Osteoporos Int. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

We explored the effects of PTH(1-84) compared with strontium ranelate on bone remodeling as measured by bone remodeling markers in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Biochemical markers of bone formation were significantly increased after treatment with PTH(1-84) but not strontium ranelate, indicating a different mechanism of action between these agents.

Introduction: PTH(1-84) and strontium ranelate (SR) are both known to reduce fracture risk in osteoporosis. Measuring changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover induced by these agents can help in characterizing the action of PTH(1-84) and SR on bone remodeling.

Methods: A 24-week, randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase IV trial was conducted in 81 postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis (≥50 years of age, lumbar spine, or total hip T-score ≤-2.5 SD) to assess the effect of SR as compared to PTH(1-84) on bone formation markers P1NP and BSAP. The bone resorption marker CTX was also measured. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive daily either 100 μg PTH(1-84) (n = 41) (subcutaneous injection) or oral 2 g SR (n = 40) for 24 weeks with daily supplements of 800 IU vitamin D(3) and 1,000 mg calcium. Patient-reported outcomes were collected to investigate the effect of treatment on quality of life (QoL).

Results: Percentage changes from baseline in P1NP and BSAP were significantly increased for PTH(1-84) by week 24 compared with SR (p < 0.0001). Significant changes from baseline in P1NP and BSAP were noted for PTH(1-84) from week 4 onwards; no significant changes were noted for SR. A trend towards a positive impact on QoL was seen with PTH(1-84) treatment. Safety profiles concur with previous analyses.

Conclusions: PTH(1-84) had a more rapid and higher effect on bone formation markers compared to SR, indicating that SR has a different mode of action on bone remodeling than the bone building agent PTH(1-84) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 2001 May 10;344(19):1434-41 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 29;350(5):459-68 - PubMed
    1. Bone. 1996 Jun;18(6):517-23 - PubMed
    1. BMC Med. 2010 Mar 24;8:18 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 11;353(6):555-65 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources