Predictors of use of hearing protection among a representative sample of farmers
- PMID: 21053386
- DOI: 10.1002/nur.20410
Predictors of use of hearing protection among a representative sample of farmers
Abstract
Farmers experience higher rates of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) than workers in most other industries. We developed a model of farmers' use of hearing protection, and tested it with a random sample (n = 532) of farmers from the upper Midwest. Barriers to using hearing protection (e.g., difficulty communicating; OR = .44, p < .003) were negatively related to use. Greater access/availability of hearing protectors (OR = 1.75, p < .010) and male gender (OR = .43, p < .019) were positively related to use. The model correctly predicted use of hearing protection for 74% of the cases. Overall, farmers demonstrated low hearing protector use, and results were similar to those from previous studies of non-farm workers. Findings from this study will be useful in designing interventions to increase farmers' hearing protector use and decrease their rates of NIHL.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Noise-induced hearing loss in agriculture: creating partnerships to overcome barriers and educate the community on prevention.Noise Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;13(51):142-6. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.77218. Noise Health. 2011. PMID: 21368439
-
A pilot study to prevent hearing loss in farmers.Public Health Nurs. 2007 Nov-Dec;24(6):547-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2007.00667.x. Public Health Nurs. 2007. PMID: 17973732 Clinical Trial.
-
Changes in the hearing status and noise injury prevention practices of Australian farmers from 1994 to 2008.J Agromedicine. 2011 Apr;16(2):127-42. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2011.554770. J Agromedicine. 2011. PMID: 21462025
-
Effects of noise and vibration on farm workers.Occup Med. 1991 Jul-Sep;6(3):355-69. Occup Med. 1991. PMID: 1948524 Review.
-
Preservation of hearing among agricultural workers: a review of literature and recommendations for future research.J Agric Saf Health. 2002 Aug;8(3):297-318. doi: 10.13031/2013.9055. J Agric Saf Health. 2002. PMID: 12363181 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving Hand Hygiene Compliance of Intensive Care Unit by Using Pender's Model.Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021 May;31(3):553-560. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i3.12. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021. PMID: 34483612 Free PMC article.
-
Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 4;19(9):5578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095578. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35564973 Free PMC article.
-
Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.Noise Health. 2016 Nov-Dec;18(85):368-375. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.195803. Noise Health. 2016. PMID: 27991469 Free PMC article.
-
Personal Protective Equipment Use and Hazardous Drug Spills Among Ambulatory Oncology Nurses.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Jan 6;44(1):60-65. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.60-65. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017. PMID: 28067030 Free PMC article.
-
A Preliminary Study of a Spanish Graphic Novella Targeting Hearing Loss Prevention.Am J Audiol. 2017 Sep 18;26(3):259-267. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0069. Am J Audiol. 2017. PMID: 28651254 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources