Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep-Oct;15(5):056003.
doi: 10.1117/1.3484751.

Actin cytoskeleton-dependent Rab GTPase-regulated angiotensin type I receptor lysosomal degradation studied by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy

Affiliations

Actin cytoskeleton-dependent Rab GTPase-regulated angiotensin type I receptor lysosomal degradation studied by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy

Hewang Li et al. J Biomed Opt. 2010 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

The dynamic regulation of the cellular trafficking of human angiotensin (Ang) type 1 receptor (AT1R) is not well understood. Therefore, we investigated the cellular trafficking of AT1R-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (AT1R-EGFP) heterologously expressed in HEK293 cells by determining the change in donor lifetime (AT1R-EGFP) in the presence or absence of acceptor(s) using fluorescence lifetime imaging-fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy. The average lifetime of AT1R-EGFP in our donor-alone samples was ∼2.33 ns. The basal state lifetime was shortened slightly in the presence of Rab5 (2.01±0.10 ns) or Rab7 (2.11±0.11 ns) labeled with Alexa 555, as the acceptor fluorophore. A 5-min Ang II treatment markedly shortened the lifetime of AT1R-EGFP in the presence of Rab5-Alexa 555 (1.78±0.31 ns) but was affected minimally in the presence of Rab7-Alexa 555 (2.09±0.37 ns). A 30-min Ang II treatment further decreased the AT1R-EGFP lifetime in the presence of both Rab5- and Rab7-Alexa 555. Latrunculin A but not nocodazole pretreatment blocked the ability of Ang II to shorten the AT1R-EGFP lifetime. The occurrence of FRET between AT1R-EGFP (donor) and LAMP1-Alexa 555 (acceptor) with Ang II stimulation was impaired by photobleaching the acceptor. These studies demonstrate that Ang II-induced AT1R lysosomal degradation through its association with LAMP1 is regulated by Rab5/7 via mechanisms that are dependent on intact actin cytoskeletons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Subcellular distributions of (a) AT1R, (b) Rab5, and (c) Rab7 in AT1R-HEK293 cells. The AT1R, tagged with EGFP at its C-terminus, is localized mainly at the plasma membrane. Both Rab5-Alexa 546 and Rab7-Alexa 633 are seen as punctuate structures throughout the cytoplasm. (d) overlay of AT1R with DAPI (blue) nuclear stain, (e) overlay of (a) (AT1R-EGFP, green) and (b) (Rab5-Alexa 546, red), and (f) overlay of (a) and (c) (Rab7-Alexa 633, blue). Bar, 10 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Internalization of AT1R induced by Ang II (100 nM) treatment for (a–f) 5 min and (g–l) 30 min in AT1R-HEK293 cells. Ang II induced the cellular internalization of (a,g) AT1R, but not (b,h) Rab5 or (c,i) Rab7. (d,j) overlays of AT1R-EGFP (green) and Rab5-Alexa 546 (red); (e,k) overlays of AT1R-EGFP (green) and Rab7-Alexa 633 (blue), and (f,l) overlays of AT1R-EGFP (green), Rab5-Alexa 546 (red), and Rab7-Alexa 633 (blue). Bar, 10 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Quantitative analysis of the colocalizations of AT1R-EGFP with Rab5-Alexa 546, Rab7-Alexa 633, and LAMP1-Alexa 633 in AT1R-HEK293 cells. AT1R-HEK293 cells were treated with vehicle (basal) or with Ang II (100 nM) for 5 or 30 min, as indicated. Quantitative analysis was carried out using MetaMorph 6.1 (Molecular Device, Downingtown, Pennsylvania), as described in section 2. Data are mean±S.E., n=8–11 cells per group. ANOVA, Student-Newman-Keuls test. ∗, P<0.05 versus Basal; #, P<0.05 versus Ang II 5 min treatment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Coimmunoprecipitation of AT1R-EGFP with (a) Rab5 and (b) Rab7 in AT1R-HEK293 cells. Cells were treated with Ang II (100 nM), at the indicated periods. One mg of cell lysates were incubated with anti-GFP IgG at 4 °C. The precipitated protein complexes were immunoblotted with (a) Rab5 mAb or (b) anti-Rab7 IgG. Both Rab5 and Rab7 coimmunoprecipitated with AT1R-GFP in the samples treated with Ang II for 5 min and 30 min. NR, normal rabbit IgG; LC, IgG light chain; NS, nonspecific band; Lys, whole cell lysate.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Analysis of the AT1R-EGFP lifetime in the absence of acceptor in AT1R-HEK293 cells. To separate the AT1R images from the background, the threshold was set at 50 (the minimum number of photon counts in the peak). The histograms (b,e) show the distribution of lifetime images of AT1R-EGFP (a,d). The decay graphs (c,f) show the trace of the fit (red) to the photon decay data (blue) at a particular pixel in the lifetime image. Scale bar, 10 μm. (Color online only.)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cytoskeletal disruption with cytoskeleton inhibitors in AT1R-HEK293 cells. Cells were treated with (a,b) vehicle (DMSO), (c,d) latrunculin A, or (e,f) nocodozale, and stained with fluorescein phalloidin to visualize F-actin (a,c,e) and anti-tubulin to visualize microtubules (b,d,f), as described in Section 2. Scale bar, 10 μm.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Subcellular distribution of AT1R-EGFP and LAMP1-Alexa 633 in AT1R-HEK293 cells. Cells were treated with Ang II (100 nM), at the indicated time periods, as described in Section 2. Green, AT1R-EGFP; Red, LAMP1-Alexa 633; yellow, colocalization. Bar, 10 μm. (Color online only.)
Figure 8
Figure 8
FLIM-FRET analysis of AT1R-EGFP interaction with LAMP1-Alexa 555 in AT1R-HEK293 cells. Cells were treated with (a) vehicle (n=15 cells), Ang II (100 nM) for (b) 5 min (n=8 cells) or (c) 30 min (n=15 cells), as described in Section 2. The AT1R-EGFP lifetime was analyzed in the presence of LAMP1-Alexa 555. Scale bar, 10 μm.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Comparison of the AT1R-EGFP lifetimes obtained before and after photobleaching the acceptor, LAMP1-Alexa 555. AT1R-HEK293 cells were treated with Ang II (100 nM) for 30 min, in the presence of LAMP1-Alexa 555 (acceptor). The DPSS 561 laser was used to photobleach the acceptor. Data are mean±S.E.; ∗ P<0.05, Student’s t-test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Gasparo M., Catt K. J., Inagami T., Wright J. W., and Unger T., “International union of pharmacology. XXIII. The angiotensin II receptors,” Pharmacol. Rev. ZZZZZZ 52, 415–472 (2000). - PubMed
    1. Jose P. A., Eisner G. M., and Felder R. A., “Renal dopamine receptors in health and hypertension,” Pharmacol. Ther. PHTHDT 80, 149–182 (1998).10.1016/S0163-7258(98)00027-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oro C., Qian H., and Thomas W. G., “Type 1 angiotensin receptor pharmacology: signaling beyond G proteins,” Pharmacol. Ther. PHTHDT 113, 210–226 (2007).10.1016/j.pharmthera.2006.10.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marchese A., Paing M. M., Temple B. R., and Trejo J., “G protein-coupled receptor sorting to endosomes and lysosomes,” Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. ARPTDI 48, 601–629 (2008).10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094646 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dale L. B., Seachrist J. L., Babwah A. V., and Ferguson S. S., “Regulation of angiotensin II type 1A receptor intracellular retention, degradation, and recycling by Rab5, Rab7, and Rab11 GTPases,” J. Biol. Chem. JBCHA3 279, 13110–13118 (2004).10.1074/jbc.M313333200 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms