Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 2):319-35.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01202.x. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

Measuring the impact of outreach and enrollment strategies for public health insurance in California

Affiliations

Measuring the impact of outreach and enrollment strategies for public health insurance in California

Michael R Cousineau et al. Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND STUDY SETTING: To evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches to outreach on public health insurance enrollment in 25 California counties with a Children's Health Initiative.

Data source: Administrative enrollment databases.

Study design: The use of eight enrollment strategies were identified in each quarter from 2001 to 2007 for each of 25 counties (county quarter). Strategies were categorized as either technology or nontechnology. New enrollments were obtained for Medi-Cal, Healthy Families, and Healthy Kids. Bivariate and multivariate analyses assessed the link between each strategy and new enrollments rates of children.

Data collection: Methods Surveys of key informants determined whether a specific outreach strategy was used in each quarter. These were linked to new enrollments in each county quarter.

Principal findings: Between 2001 and 2007, enrollment grew in all three children's health programs. We controlled for the effects of counties, seasons, and county-specific child poverty rates. There was an increase in enrollment rates of 11 percent in periods when technology-based systems were in use compared with when these approaches were inactive. Non-technology-based approaches, including school-linked approaches, yielded a 12 percent increase in new enrollments rates. Deploying seven to eight strategies yielded 54 percent more new enrollments per 10,000 children compared with periods with none of the specific strategies.

Conclusions and implications: National health care reform provides new opportunities to expand coverage to millions of Americans. An investment in technology-based enrollment systems will maximize new enrollments, particularly into Medicaid; nontechnological approaches may help identify harder-to-reach populations. Moreover, incorporating several strategies, whether phased in or implemented simultaneously, will enhance enrollments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Deployment of Nontechnology Outreach and Enrollment Strategies in California Counties by Quarters, 2001–2008. N=24 counties* *Although 25 counties participated in the study, two counties participated as a region and were analyzed together; therefore, n=24.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Use of Technology Tools for Outreach and Enrollment in California Counties, 2001–2008. N=24 counties* *Although 25 counties participated in the study, two counties participated as a region and were analyzed together; therefore, n=24.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average Monthly New Enrollments by Quarter. Medi-Cal,(1) Healthy Families,(2) and Healthy Kids(3) in California Counties, 2001–2007. N=24 counties* Source: Enrollment data were provided separately for each program. They include the following: (1) California Department of Health Services, Medi-Cal Division, (2) Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board, (3) Healthy Kids Enrollment data were provided by each participating health plan. *Although 25 counties participated in the study, two counties participated as a region and were analyzed together; therefore, n=24.

References

    1. Barents Group LLC. 2000. Final Report on Evaluations of Outreach for Public Health Insurance and Selected Other Programs. Prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Center for Organizational and Delivery Systems.
    1. Brown ER, Kronick R, Ponce NA, Kincheloe JR, Lavarreda SA, Peckham E. 2009. “ The State of Health Insurance in California: Findings from the 2007 California Health Interview Survey” [accessed on November 2009]. Available at http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/pubs/Publication.aspx?pubID=374.
    1. Buchmueller TC, Grumbach K, Kronick R, Kahn JG. The Effect of Health Insurance on Medical Care Utilization and Implications for Insurance Expansion: A Review of the Literature. Medical Care Research and Review. 2005;62(1):3–30. - PubMed
    1. California Department of Health Services. “Data & Statistics” [accessed on December 2009]. Available at http://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstats/Pages/default.aspx.
    1. Castaneda X, Clayson Z, Rundall T, Dong L, Sercaz M. Promising Outreach Practices: Enrolling Low Income Children in Health Insurance Programs in California. Health Promotion Practice. 2003;4(4):430–8. - PubMed

MeSH terms