Establishing IUCN Red List criteria for threatened ecosystems
- PMID: 21054525
- PMCID: PMC3051828
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01598.x
Establishing IUCN Red List criteria for threatened ecosystems
Abstract
The potential for conservation of individual species has been greatly advanced by the International Union for Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) development of objective, repeatable, and transparent criteria for assessing extinction risk that explicitly separate risk assessment from priority setting. At the IV World Conservation Congress in 2008, the process began to develop and implement comparable global standards for ecosystems. A working group established by the IUCN has begun formulating a system of quantitative categories and criteria, analogous to those used for species, for assigning levels of threat to ecosystems at local, regional, and global levels. A final system will require definitions of ecosystems; quantification of ecosystem status; identification of the stages of degradation and loss of ecosystems; proxy measures of risk (criteria); classification thresholds for these criteria; and standardized methods for performing assessments. The system will need to reflect the degree and rate of change in an ecosystem's extent, composition, structure, and function, and have its conceptual roots in ecological theory and empirical research. On the basis of these requirements and the hypothesis that ecosystem risk is a function of the risk of its component species, we propose a set of four criteria: recent declines in distribution or ecological function, historical total loss in distribution or ecological function, small distribution combined with decline, or very small distribution. Most work has focused on terrestrial ecosystems, but comparable thresholds and criteria for freshwater and marine ecosystems are also needed. These are the first steps in an international consultation process that will lead to a unified proposal to be presented at the next World Conservation Congress in 2012.
©2010 Society for Conservation Biology.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140003. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0003. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015. PMID: 25561664 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of ecosystems.PLoS One. 2013 May 8;8(5):e62111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062111. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23667454 Free PMC article.
-
Extinction risk of the endemic vascular flora of Kauai, Hawaii, based on IUCN assessments.Conserv Biol. 2022 Aug;36(4):e13896. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13896. Epub 2022 Apr 18. Conserv Biol. 2022. PMID: 35146804 Free PMC article.
-
Contributions of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems to risk-based design and management of protected and conserved areas in Africa.Conserv Biol. 2024 Jun;38(3):e14169. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14169. Epub 2024 Mar 15. Conserv Biol. 2024. PMID: 37650432
-
Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species.Conserv Biol. 2008 Dec;22(6):1424-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01044.x. Epub 2008 Sep 25. Conserv Biol. 2008. PMID: 18847444 Review.
Cited by
-
Accounting for functionality in the identification of global conservation priorities: promises and pitfalls.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230209. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0209. Epub 2025 Jan 9. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025. PMID: 39780596 Review.
-
Historical ecology with real numbers: past and present extent and biomass of an imperilled estuarine habitat.Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 7;279(1742):3393-400. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0313. Epub 2012 Jun 13. Proc Biol Sci. 2012. PMID: 22696522 Free PMC article.
-
The use of plant community attributes to detect habitat quality in coastal environments.AoB Plants. 2016 Jul 11;8:plw040. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plw040. Print 2016. AoB Plants. 2016. PMID: 27255516 Free PMC article.
-
A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140003. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0003. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015. PMID: 25561664 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cryptic species conservation: a review.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Feb;100(1):258-274. doi: 10.1111/brv.13139. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025. PMID: 39234845 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abell R, et al. Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience. 2008;58:403–414.
-
- Beechie TJ, Sear DA, Olden JD, Pess GR, Buffington JM, Moir H, Roni P, Pollock MM. Processed principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience. 2010;60:209–222.
-
- Benson JS. New South Wales Vegetation Classification and Assessment: introduction – the classification, database, assessment of protected areas and threat status of plant communities. Cunninghamia. 2006;9:331–382.
-
- Benson JS, Allen C, Togher C, Lemmon J. New South Wales Vegetation Classification and Assessment: part 1. Plant communities of the NSW Western Plains. Cunninghamia. 2006;9:383–451.
-
- Butchart SH, Akçakaya HR, Chanson J, Baillie J, Collen B, Quader S, Turner WR, Amin R, Stuart SN, Hilton-Taylor C. Improvements to the Red List Index. Public Library of Science ONE. 2007;2 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000140. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases