Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov 5:11:85.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-85.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of pregabalin in older patients with neuropathic pain: results from a pooled analysis of 11 clinical studies

Affiliations

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of pregabalin in older patients with neuropathic pain: results from a pooled analysis of 11 clinical studies

David Semel et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Older patients are typically underrepresented in clinical trials of medications for chronic pain. A post hoc analysis of multiple clinical studies of pregabalin in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) or postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in older patients.

Methods: Data from 11 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies of pregabalin in patients with DPN or PHN were pooled. Efficacy outcomes included change in Daily Pain Rating Scale score, ≥30% and ≥50% responders, and endpoint pain score ≤3. Safety was based on adverse events (AEs). Primary efficacy was analyzed by analysis of covariance with terms for treatment, age category, protocol, baseline pain, and treatment-by-age category interaction.

Results: 2516 patients (white, n = 2344 [93.2%]; men, n = 1347 [53.5%]; PHN, n = 1003 [39.9%]; pregabalin, n = 1595) were included in the analysis. Patients were grouped by age: 18 to 64 years (n = 1236), 65 to 74 years (n = 766), and ≥75 years (n = 514). Baseline mean pain and sleep interference scores were comparable across treatment and age groups. Significant improvements in endpoint mean pain were observed for all pregabalin dosages versus placebo in all age groups (p ≤ 0.0009), except for the lowest dosage (150 mg/day) in the youngest age group. Clinically meaningful pain relief, defined as ≥30% and ≥50% pain response, was observed in all age groups. The most common AEs were dizziness, somnolence, peripheral edema, asthenia, dry mouth, weight gain, and infections. The relative risks for these AEs increased with pregabalin dose, but did not appear related to older age or type of neuropathic pain.

Conclusions: Pregabalin (150-600 mg/day) significantly reduced pain in older patients (age ≥65 years) with neuropathic pain and improvements in pain were comparable to those observed in younger patients. Titration of pregabalin to the lowest effective dose should allow for effective pain relief while minimizing AEs in older patients with neuropathic pain. Given the common use of polypharmacy in older patients, the absence of known drug-drug interactions makes pregabalin an important treatment option for older patients with pain of neuropathic origin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Baseline mean pain (A) and sleep interference (B) scores by age and dosage group. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean. Number above each bar is number of patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in mean pain (A) and sleep interference (B) scores at endpoint. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean. Number above each bar is number of patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Placebo-adjusted endpoint mean pain by pregabalin dosage. The upper panel (A) shows placebo-adjusted endpoint mean pain for pooled age groups. The lower panel (B) shows placebo-adjusted endpoint mean pain by age and dosage group. Bars represent the 95% confidence interval. *p < 0.0001 versus placebo. **p ≤ 0.0009 versus placebo.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relative risks for the most frequent adverse events for pregabalin 300 mg/day versus placebo by age group. The left panel shows the percentage of patients in each age group that reported a particular adverse event by treatment group. The right panel shows the relative risk of given adverse events in each age group for pregabalin versus placebo. CI: confidence interval; WG: weight gain; Somn: somnolence; Inf: infection; PE: peripheral edema; DM: dry mouth; DZ: dizziness; Asth: asthenia.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haslam C, Nurmikko T. Pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain in older persons. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3:111–120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salazar JA, Poon I, Nair M. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly: expect the unexpected, think the unthinkable. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007;6:695–704. doi: 10.1517/14740338.6.6.695. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Delafuente JC. Understanding and preventing drug interactions in elderly patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48:133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2003.04.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klotz U. Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism in the elderly. Drug Metab Rev. 2009;41:67–76. doi: 10.1080/03602530902722679. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oster G, Berger A, Dukes E, Edelsberg J, McCarberg B. Use of potentially inappropriate pain-related medications in older adults with painful neuropathic disorders. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2004;2:163–170. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2004.09.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources