Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in cardiac arrest (PaRAMeDIC) trial protocol
- PMID: 21054860
- PMCID: PMC2993645
- DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-58
Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in cardiac arrest (PaRAMeDIC) trial protocol
Abstract
Background: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is closely linked to the quality of CPR, but in real life, resuscitation during prehospital care and ambulance transport is often suboptimal. Mechanical chest compression devices deliver consistent chest compressions, are not prone to fatigue and could potentially overcome some of the limitations of manual chest compression. However, there is no high-quality evidence that they improve clinical outcomes, or that they are cost effective. The Prehospital Randomised Assessment of a Mechanical Compression Device In Cardiac Arrest (PARAMEDIC) trial is a pragmatic cluster randomised study of the LUCAS-2 device in adult patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Methods/design: The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the effect of chest compression using LUCAS-2 on mortality at 30 days post out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, compared with manual chest compression. Secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the effects of LUCAS-2 on survival to 12 months, cognitive and quality of life outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Methods: Ambulance service vehicles will be randomised to either manual compression (control) or LUCAS arms. Adult patients in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, attended by a trial vehicle will be eligible for inclusion. Patients with traumatic cardiac arrest or who are pregnant will be excluded. The trial will recruit approximately 4000 patients from England, Wales and Scotland. A waiver of initial consent has been approved by the Research Ethics Committees. Consent will be sought from survivors for participation in the follow-up phase.
Conclusion: The trial will assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of the LUCAS-2 mechanical chest compression device.
Trial registration: The trial is registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry (ISRCTN08233942).
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(11):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta21110. Health Technol Assess. 2017. PMID: 28393757 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):947-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61886-9. Epub 2014 Nov 16. Lancet. 2015. PMID: 25467566 Clinical Trial.
-
The cost-effectiveness of a mechanical compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation. 2017 Aug;117:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.04.036. Epub 2017 May 2. Resuscitation. 2017. PMID: 28476479 Clinical Trial.
-
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):CD007260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007260.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30125048 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical devices for chest compression: to use or not to use?Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Jun;21(3):188-94. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000200. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 25887299 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of the LUCAS mechanical chest compression device for percutaneous coronary intervention during cardiac arrest: is it really a game changer?HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2011;3(3):203-5. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2011. PMID: 23439929 Free PMC article.
-
Choosing sensitivity analyses for randomised trials: principles.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jan 24;14:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-11. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014. PMID: 24456267 Free PMC article.
-
Traumatic injuries after mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (LUCAS2): a forensic autopsy study.Int J Legal Med. 2015 Sep;129(5):1035-42. doi: 10.1007/s00414-015-1146-x. Epub 2015 Jan 27. Int J Legal Med. 2015. PMID: 25874665
-
[Mechanical resuscitation assist devices].Anaesthesist. 2014 Mar;63(3):186-97. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2265-8. Anaesthesist. 2014. PMID: 24569931 Review. German.
-
Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Feb 6;17:9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0092-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2016. PMID: 26852412 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- London Ambulance Service Cardiac Arrest Annual Report 2008/9. http://www.londonambulance.nhs.uk/about_us/idoc.ashx?docid=498ba02b-466b...
-
- Ambulance Service Association and Joint Royal College Ambulance Liaison Committee. National Cardiac Arrest Audit Report. 2006.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical