Gender differences in mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock
- PMID: 21056869
- PMCID: PMC3322379
- DOI: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.09.005
Gender differences in mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock
Abstract
Background: Although the incidence of sepsis is higher in men than in women, it is controversial whether there are sex-based differences in sepsis-associated mortality.
Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that hospital mortality is higher in males compared with females with severe sepsis/septic shock who require intensive care.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of intensive care unit (ICU) patients hospitalized (in 98 ICUs in 71 US hospitals and 4 Canadian or Brazilian hospitals) with severe sepsis/septic shock between mid-2003 and 2006, using data from the Cerner Project IMPACT database.
Results: Data were analyzed for 18,757 ICU patients (median age, 66 years; interquartile range, 53-77 years), including 8702 females (46%). Hospital mortality was higher in female patients compared with male patients (35% vs 33%, respectively; P = 0.006). After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and processes of care, females had a higher likelihood of hospital mortality than did males (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19; P = 0.002). Female patients were less likely than male patients to receive deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis (OR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.86), or hemodialysis catheters (OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93). Females were more likely than males to receive red blood cell transfusions (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.22) and code status limitations (OR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.18-1.47).
Conclusions: In this large cohort of ICU patients, females with severe sepsis/septic shock had a higher risk of dying in the hospital than did males. This difference remained after multivariable adjustment. Significant gender disparities were also found in some aspects of care delivery, but these did not explain the higher mortality in female patients.
Copyright © 2010 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Nicol T, Bilbey DLJ, Cordingley CJL, et al. Oestrogen: the natural stimulant of body defense. J Endocrinol. 1964;30:277–291. - PubMed
-
- Angele MK, Wichmann MW, Ayala A, et al. Testosterone receptor blockade after hemorrhage in males: restoration of the depressed immune functions and improved survival following subsequent sepsis. Arch Surg. 1997;132:1207–1214. - PubMed
-
- Kuebler JF, Jarrar D, Toth B, et al. Estradiol administration improves splanchnic perfusion following trauma-hemorrhage and sepsis. Arch Surg. 2002;137:74–79. - PubMed
-
- Annane D, Aegerter P, Jars-Guincestre MC, et al. Current epidemiology of septic shock: the CUB-Rea Network. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:165–172. - PubMed
-
- Sands KE, Bates DW, Lanken PN, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis syndrome in 8 academic medical centers. JAMA. 1997;278:234–240. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
