Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Oct 21:6:915-22.
doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S8161.

Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations

Sudhir Rathore  1
Affiliations
Review

Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations

Sudhir Rathore. Vasc Health Risk Manag. .

Abstract

Small vessel (<3 mm) coronary artery disease is common and has been identified as independent predictor of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. It remains controversial whether bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation in small vessels has an advantage over balloon angioplasty in terms of angiographic and clinical outcomes. Introduction of drug-eluting stent (DES) has resulted in significant reduction in restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization. Several DESs have been introduced resulting in varying reduction in outcomes as compared with BMS. However, their impact on outcomes in small vessels is not clearly known. It is expected that DES could substantially reduce restenosis in smaller vessels. Large, randomized studies are warranted to assess the impact of different DESs on outcomes in patients with small coronary arteries.

Keywords: coronary artery disease; drug-eluting stent; restenosis; small coronary arteries; stent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mackay J, Menash G. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation, Centers for disease control and prevention; 2004.
    1. Wong P, Lau KW, Lim YL, Oesterele SN. Stent placement for non-STRESS/BENESTENT lesions: a critical review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;51:223–233. - PubMed
    1. O’Connor NJ, Morton JR, Birmeyer JD, Olmstead EM, O’Connor GT Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Effect of coronary artery diameter in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 1996;93:652–655. - PubMed
    1. Bauters C, Hubert E, Prat A, et al. Predictors of restenosis after coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1291–1298. - PubMed
    1. Serruys PW, Kay IP, Disco C, et al. Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: results of a meta analysis of the Belgian Netherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter ultrasound stent in coronaries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1067–1074. - PubMed

MeSH terms