Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia
- PMID: 21057616
- PMCID: PMC2966707
- DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2010.59.4.260
Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia
Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia conducted for many surgical procedures. Multiple factors can affect the success, the side effects, and patient satisfaction with the procedure. This study was undertaken prospectively to discover factors affecting dissatisfaction and refusal of spinal anesthesia.
Methods: Starting in December 2007, patients who underwent spinal anesthesia in the operating rooms of our hospital were surveyed over a period of a year. Before attempting the procedure, patient characteristics and previous history of anesthesia were recorded. Spinal anesthesia was administered with 0.5% heavy bupivacaine combined with fentanyl 0-20 µg. Intraoperative data and postoperative data on the day after surgery were collected. The patients were also asked about their general satisfaction with spinal anesthesia, causes of dissatisfaction with the procedure, and causes of their refusal to have spinal anesthesia again.
Results: Six patients among 1,197 cases were excluded from the study because of spinal anesthesia failure. The dissatisfaction rate of spinal anesthesia was 3.7%, and its risk factors were more than three puncture attempts, paresthesia at puncture, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative backache. The refusal rate to have spinal anesthesia again was 3.2%, and its risk factors were postoperative backache and dissatisfaction.
Conclusions: Although spinal anesthesia was conducted safely during the study and revealed a high rate of patient satisfaction (96.3%), side effects still occurred. Therefore, attending anesthesiologists must perform the procedure carefully and always pay attention to patients under spinal anesthesia.
Keywords: Dissatisfaction; Refusal; Spinal anesthesia.
Similar articles
-
Factors related to patient satisfaction regarding spinal anesthesia.J Med Assoc Thai. 2003 Jun;86 Suppl 2:S338-43. J Med Assoc Thai. 2003. PMID: 12930008
-
[Patient dissatisfaction with anesthetic care].Masui. 2004 Oct;53(10):1136-42. Masui. 2004. PMID: 15552945 Japanese.
-
Survey on maternal satisfaction in receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.Malays J Med Sci. 2013 May;20(3):51-4. Malays J Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 23966825 Free PMC article.
-
Spinal anesthesia in infants undergoing urologic surgery duration greater than 60 minutes.J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Dec;18(6):786.e1-786.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 14. J Pediatr Urol. 2022. PMID: 35945145 Review.
-
Efficacy of Intrathecal Fentanyl for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis.Anesth Analg. 2020 Jan;130(1):111-125. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003975. Anesth Analg. 2020. PMID: 30633056
Cited by
-
Incidence of newly developed postoperative low back pain with median versus paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Dec;73(6):518-524. doi: 10.4097/kja.19409. Epub 2020 Jan 7. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020. PMID: 31906607 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A comprehensive, bed-side scoring system to predict difficult lumbar puncture.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jan-Mar;39(1):38-44. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_77_21. Epub 2022 Jan 28. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37250250 Free PMC article.
-
Characterising the patient experience of diagnostic lumbar puncture in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a cross-sectional online survey.BMJ Open. 2018 May 30;8(5):e020445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020445. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29848770 Free PMC article.
-
The association of anesthetic method with developing back pain after lower extremity operations.Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Nov 16;4(5):e18194. doi: 10.5812/aapm.18194. eCollection 2014 Dec. Anesth Pain Med. 2014. PMID: 25798375 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Satisfaction Survey on Perioperative Anesthesia Service in University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021.Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2021 Oct 22;2021:3379850. doi: 10.1155/2021/3379850. eCollection 2021. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2021. PMID: 34721572 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mauermann WJ, Shilling AM, Zuo Z. A comparison of nueraxial block versus general anesthesia for elective total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1018–1025. - PubMed
-
- Mulroy MF, Larkin KL, Hodgson PS, Helman JD, Pollock JE, Liu SS. A comparison of spinal, epidural, and general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:860–864. - PubMed
-
- Choi JG, In JY, Shin HI. Analysis of factors related to patient refusal of spinal anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2009;56:156–161. - PubMed
-
- Wu CL, Naqibuddin M, Fleisher LA. Measurement of patients satisfaction as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:196–208. - PubMed
-
- Oh SH, Kim IH, Choi SR, Chung CJ. Causes of patient disstisfaction with anesthetic care. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2005;48:387–392.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources