Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;59(4):260-4.
doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.59.4.260. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia

Affiliations

Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia

Won Ji Rhee et al. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia conducted for many surgical procedures. Multiple factors can affect the success, the side effects, and patient satisfaction with the procedure. This study was undertaken prospectively to discover factors affecting dissatisfaction and refusal of spinal anesthesia.

Methods: Starting in December 2007, patients who underwent spinal anesthesia in the operating rooms of our hospital were surveyed over a period of a year. Before attempting the procedure, patient characteristics and previous history of anesthesia were recorded. Spinal anesthesia was administered with 0.5% heavy bupivacaine combined with fentanyl 0-20 µg. Intraoperative data and postoperative data on the day after surgery were collected. The patients were also asked about their general satisfaction with spinal anesthesia, causes of dissatisfaction with the procedure, and causes of their refusal to have spinal anesthesia again.

Results: Six patients among 1,197 cases were excluded from the study because of spinal anesthesia failure. The dissatisfaction rate of spinal anesthesia was 3.7%, and its risk factors were more than three puncture attempts, paresthesia at puncture, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative backache. The refusal rate to have spinal anesthesia again was 3.2%, and its risk factors were postoperative backache and dissatisfaction.

Conclusions: Although spinal anesthesia was conducted safely during the study and revealed a high rate of patient satisfaction (96.3%), side effects still occurred. Therefore, attending anesthesiologists must perform the procedure carefully and always pay attention to patients under spinal anesthesia.

Keywords: Dissatisfaction; Refusal; Spinal anesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mauermann WJ, Shilling AM, Zuo Z. A comparison of nueraxial block versus general anesthesia for elective total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1018–1025. - PubMed
    1. Mulroy MF, Larkin KL, Hodgson PS, Helman JD, Pollock JE, Liu SS. A comparison of spinal, epidural, and general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:860–864. - PubMed
    1. Choi JG, In JY, Shin HI. Analysis of factors related to patient refusal of spinal anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2009;56:156–161. - PubMed
    1. Wu CL, Naqibuddin M, Fleisher LA. Measurement of patients satisfaction as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:196–208. - PubMed
    1. Oh SH, Kim IH, Choi SR, Chung CJ. Causes of patient disstisfaction with anesthetic care. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2005;48:387–392.