Understanding the FDA guidance on adaptive designs: historical, legal, and statistical perspectives
- PMID: 21058114
- DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2010.514462
Understanding the FDA guidance on adaptive designs: historical, legal, and statistical perspectives
Abstract
The recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry on adaptive designs is perhaps one of the important undertakings by CDER/CBER Office of Biostatistics. Undoubtedly, adaptive designs may affect almost all phases of clinical development and impact nearly all aspects of clinical trial planning, execution and statistical inference. Thus, it is a significant accomplishment for the Office of Biostatistics to develop this well-thought-out and all-encompassing guidance document. In this paper, we discuss some critical topical issues of adaptive designs with supporting methodological work from either existing literature, additional technical notes, or accompanying papers. In particular, we provide numerous sources of design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation bias that arise from statistical procedures. We illustrate, as a result, and caution that substantial research is necessary for many adaptive designs to meet required scientific standards prior to their applications in clinical trials.
Similar articles
-
Viewpoints on the FDA draft adaptive designs guidance from the PhRMA working group.J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Nov;20(6):1115-24. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2010.514452. J Biopharm Stat. 2010. PMID: 21058107
-
Review of draft FDA adaptive design guidance.J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Nov;20(6):1132-42. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2010.514455. J Biopharm Stat. 2010. PMID: 21058109 Review.
-
FDA draft guidance on adaptive design clinical trials: Pfizer's perspective.J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Nov;20(6):1143-9. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2010.514456. J Biopharm Stat. 2010. PMID: 21058110
-
On flexibility of adaptive designs and criteria for choosing a good one--a discussion of FDA draft guidance.J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Nov;20(6):1171-7. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2010.514460. J Biopharm Stat. 2010. PMID: 21058113
-
Pharmacometrics at FDA: evolution and impact on decisions.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jul;82(1):97-102. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100234. Epub 2007 May 30. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007. PMID: 17538553 Review.
Cited by
-
On robustness of noninferiority clinical trial designs against bias, variability, and nonconstancy.J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(1):206-25. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.923738. J Biopharm Stat. 2015. PMID: 24918326 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials: Application to Healthcare Epidemiology Research.Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):1140-1146. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix907. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 29121202 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adaptive design of confirmatory trials: Advances and challenges.Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 14. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015. PMID: 26079372 Free PMC article.
-
An Investigation of the Shortcomings of the CONSORT 2010 Statement for the Reporting of Group Sequential Randomised Controlled Trials: A Methodological Systematic Review.PLoS One. 2015 Nov 3;10(11):e0141104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141104. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26528812 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical