Comparative Study
doi: 10.1071/sh10026.
Commentary on opinion pieces re Australian human papillomavirus vaccine policy
Affiliations
- PMID: 21058498
- DOI: 10.1071/sh10026
Item in Clipboard
Comparative Study
Commentary on opinion pieces re Australian human papillomavirus vaccine policy
Sex Health.
2010 Sep.
No abstract available
Comment on
-
For debate: that Australia should continue using the quadrivalent vaccine.Sex Health. 2010 Sep;7(3):235-7. doi: 10.1071/sh09129. Sex Health. 2010. PMID: 21058496 No abstract available.
-
For debate: that Australia should consider changing to the bivalent vaccine.Sex Health. 2010 Sep;7(3):238-41. doi: 10.1071/sh09131. Sex Health. 2010. PMID: 21058497 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
For debate: that Australia should continue using the quadrivalent vaccine.Sex Health. 2010 Sep;7(3):235-7. doi: 10.1071/sh09129. Sex Health. 2010. PMID: 21058496 No abstract available.
-
For debate: that Australia should consider changing to the bivalent vaccine.Sex Health. 2010 Sep;7(3):238-41. doi: 10.1071/sh09131. Sex Health. 2010. PMID: 21058497 No abstract available.
-
A brief history of economic evaluation for human papillomavirus vaccination policy.Sex Health. 2010 Sep;7(3):352-8. doi: 10.1071/SH10018. Sex Health. 2010. PMID: 20719227
-
Cervical cancer vaccine development.Sex Health. 2010 Sep;7(3):230-4. doi: 10.1071/SH09132. Sex Health. 2010. PMID: 20719210 Review.
-
Unresolved questions concerning human papillomavirus infection and transmission: a modelling perspective.Sex Health. 2010 Sep;7(3):368-75. doi: 10.1071/SH10006. Sex Health. 2010. PMID: 20719229 Review.