Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Nov-Dec;8(6):499-506.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1145.

Changes in patient experiences of primary care during health service reforms in England between 2003 and 2007

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Changes in patient experiences of primary care during health service reforms in England between 2003 and 2007

Stephen M Campbell et al. Ann Fam Med. 2010 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Major primary care reforms have been introduced in recent years in the United Kingdom, including financial incentives to improve clinical quality and provide more rapid access to care. Little is known about the impact of these changes on patient experience. We examine patient reports of quality of care between 2003 and 2007, including random samples of patients on practice lists and patients with long-term conditions.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional design study of family practices in which questionnaires were sent to serial samples of patients in 42 representative general practices in England. Questionnaires sent to samples of patients with chronic disease (asthma, angina, and diabetes) and random samples of adult patients (excluding patients who reported any long-term condition) in 2003, 2005, and 2007 addressed issues of access, communication, continuity of care, coordination, nursing care, and overall satisfaction.

Results: There were no significant changes in quality of care reported by either group of patients between 2003 and 2007 for communication, nursing care, coordination, and overall satisfaction. Some aspects of access improved significantly for patients with chronic disease, but not for the random samples of patients. Patients in both samples reported seeing their usual physician less often and gave lower satisfaction ratings for continuity of care. Most scores were significantly higher for the chronic illness samples than for the random samples of patients in 2003, even after adjusting for age.

Conclusions: There was a modest improvement in access to care for patients with chronic illness, but all patients now find it somewhat harder to obtain continuity of care. This outcome may be related to the incentives to provide rapid appointments or to the increased number of specialized clinics in primary care. The possibility of unintended effects needs to be considered when introducing pay for performance schemes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Department of Health. The NHS Plan. A Plan For Investment. A Plan For Reform. London: Department of Health; 2000.
    1. Pope C, Banks J, Salisbury C, Lattimer V. Improving access to primary care: eight case studies of introducing Advanced Access in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(1):33–39. - PubMed
    1. Roland M. Linking physician pay to quality of care: a major experiment in the UK. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(14):1448–1454. - PubMed
    1. Edwards A, Neal RD. The effect of the new GMS contract on GP appointment provision in Wales: postal questionnaire survey of practice managers. BMC Research Notes. 2008;1:118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gemmell I, Campbell S, Hann M, Sibbald B. Assessing workload in English general practice before and after the introduction of pay-for-performance. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(3):509–515. - PubMed

Publication types