Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Nov;60(580):822-8.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X532602.

Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences

Vicki Tsianakas et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Timely antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia (SC&T) screening for all women in primary care facilitates informed decision making, but little is known about its implementation.

Aim: To assess the feasibility of offering antenatal SC&T screening in primary care at the time of pregnancy confirmation.

Design of study: Cross-sectional investigation of GPs' beliefs and perceived practices.

Method: Informal face-to-face interviews with 34 GPs.

Setting: Seventeen inner-city general practices that offered antenatal SC&T screening as part of a trial.

Results: GPs identified both barriers and facilitators. Organisational barriers included inflexible appointment systems and lack of interpreters for women whose first language was not English. Professional barriers included concerns about raising possible adverse outcomes in the first antenatal visit. Perceived patient barriers included women's lack of awareness of SC&T. Hence, GPs presented the test to women as routine, rather than as a choice. Organisational facilitators included simple and flexible systems for offering screening in primary care, practice cohesion, and training. Professional facilitators included positive attitudes to screening for SC&T. Perceived patient facilitators included women's desire for healthy children.

Conclusion: GPs reported barriers, as well as facilitators, to successful implementation but the extent to which screening could be regarded as offering 'informed choice' remained fundamental when making sense of these barriers and facilitators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NHS Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Screening Programme. Standards for linked antenatal and newborn screening programme. UK National Screening Programme 2006 http://sct.screening.nhs.uk/aboutus#fileid10600 (accessed 30 Sep 2010) - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. Clinical Guideline 6. London: NICE; 2003. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG062NICEguideline.pdf (accessed 21 Sep 2010) - PubMed
    1. Neuenschwander H, Modell B. Audit of process of antenatal screening for sickle cell disorders at a north London hospital. BMJ. 1997;315(7111):784–785. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dormandy E, Gulliford MC, Reid EP, et al. Delay between pregnancy confirmation and sickle cell and thalassaemia screening: a population-based cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58(548):154–159. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas P, Oni L, Alli M, et al. Antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care: A whole system participatory action research project. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(515):424–428. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types