Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;39(8):475-85.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/29741224.

Temporomandibular joint and 3.0 T pseudodynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Part 1: evaluation of condylar and disc dysfunction

Affiliations

Temporomandibular joint and 3.0 T pseudodynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Part 1: evaluation of condylar and disc dysfunction

H Iwasaki et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: This study describes an improved method for examining and diagnosing temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dynamics by 3.0 T pseudodynamic MRI.

Methods: Clinical observation and conventional static MRI of volunteers (one without and eight with TMJ arthrosis) were followed by 3.0 T pseudodynamic MRI in positions ranging from the mouth closed to mouth fully opened. Condylar head (Cd), articular disc anterior border (Da) and articular disc posterior border (Dp) were digitized on sagittal images to determine trajectory and velocity patterns.

Results: Patients were divided into three groups based on the presence or absence of dysfunction: Group 1, no dysfunction on the right or left side of the TMJ; Group 2, dysfunction on the right or left side of the TMJ; and Group 3, dysfunction on both the right and left sides of the TMJs. In 75% of patients (12 of 16 joints), pseudodynamic TMJ analysis was useful for determining a functional abnormality. Using a points system based on three trajectory and seven velocity patterns, discs with adhesion and perforation had significantly fewer points than discs with anterior displacement (with and without reduction) and discs with no abnormality (P = 0.019 < 0.05).

Conclusions: Trajectory and velocity patterns based on 3.0 T pseudodynamic MRI identified the affected side and determined the extent of morbidity in the Cd as well as the Da and Dp. The typical abnormal movement pattern of discs with anterior displacement (with and without reduction) and pathological structural changes of the articular disc (such as adhesion and perforation) could be identified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Co-ordinate points for pseudodynamic measurement. Em, lowest articular eminence; Cd, highest protrusion of the condylar head, where the perpendicular line from the posterior mandibular ramus meets the condylar head; Da, articular disc anterior border, where the posterior border of the anterior attachment showing low signal intensity is separated from the surrounding area in the anterior band of the articular disc; Dp, articular disc posterior border, where a bow tie configuration is derived from a temporal part of posterior attachment and a condylar part of posterior attachment
Figure 2
Figure 2
Normal (a) trajectory and (b) velocity patterns (Case 1, left temporomandibular joint)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trajectory patterns I-a, I-b, II and III; Cd, condylar head; Dp, posterior border of the articular disc; Type I, relatively curved; subtype I-a, downward trajectory at flap 0 to 1; subtype I-b, upward trajectory at flap 0 to 1; Type II, relatively short and straight; Type III, zigzag
Figure 4
Figure 4
Velocity patterns 1A/2A/3A, 1B/2B/3B, 4A/5A/6A/7 and 4B/5B/6B/7. Type 1, chevron shape with one peak; Type 2, U-shape with one trough; Type 3, convexo-concave shape with one peak and one trough; Type 4, convexo-concave shape with a total of three asperities of velocity; Type 5, without peak or trough in velocity and move or stop gradually; Type 6, without peak or trough in velocity and becomes temporally stable; Type 7, without peak or trough in velocity and stable; 0–1 flap, initial step; 1–2 flaps, early steps; 2–3 flaps, intermediate steps; 3–4 flaps, late steps; 4–5 flaps, final steps
Figure 5
Figure 5
Anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDwR) (Case 4): (a) trajectory pattern and (b) velocity pattern
Figure 6
Figure 6
Anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwR) (Case 6): (a) trajectory pattern and (b) velocity paltern
Figure 7
Figure 7
Disc adhesion (Case 9): (a) trajectory pattern and (b) velocity pattern
Figure 8
Figure 8
Disc perforation (Case 8): (a) trajectory pattern and (b) velocity pattern

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen J, Buckwalter K. Displacement analysis of the temporomandibular condyle from magnetic resonance images. J Biomech 1993;26:1455–1462 - PubMed
    1. Eberhard D, Bantleon HP, Steger W. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of temporomandibular joint disorders. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:489–497 - PubMed
    1. Liu ZJ, Yamagata K, Kuroe K, Suenaga S, Noikura T, Ito G. Morphological and positional assessments of TMJ components and lateral pterygoid muscle in relation to symptoms and occlusion of patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:860–874 - PubMed
    1. Dorsay TA, Youngberg RA, Orr FE. Cine MRI diagnosis and posttherapeutic evaluation of an adherent TMJ disc: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:1220–1222 - PubMed
    1. Katzberg RW, Tallents RH. Normal and abnormal temporomandibular joint disc and posterior attachment as depicted by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1155–1161 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms