Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels
- PMID: 21062964
- DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq088
Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels
Abstract
Mini-implants are widely utilized as anchorage units in orthodontic treatment. Nevertheless, there are factors that interfere with their clinical performance. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of length and diameter on the primary stability of two different types of orthodontic mini-implants loaded with two force levels. A total of 90 self-drilling mini-implants were inserted in bovine ribs in vitro, 62 of which were used in data analysis. The mini-implants were of two types, Aarhus (n=29) and Lomas (n=33), of two lengths (7 and 9 mm, n=26 and n=28, respectively), and of two diameters (1.5 and 2 mm, Lomas only, n=6 and n=8, respectively). A closed nickel-titanium (NiTi) coil spring was attached to each mini-implant. Half of the preparations were loaded with a low force of 0.5 N and the other half with a force of 2.5 N. Mini-implant deflections during force application were non-invasively registered using a three-dimensional (3D) laser-optical system. The results were analysed with analysis of variance for the effects of implant type, implant length, and force level, and with a t-test for the study of the effect of diameter in two different diameter variants of the same (Lomas) implant. In the low-force group, implant displacements were not statistically significant difference according to the investigated parameters. In the high-force group, the 9 mm long mini-implants displaced significantly less (10.5±7.5 μm) than the 7 mm long (22.3±11.3 μm, P<0.01) and the 2 mm wide significantly less (8.8±2.2 μm) than the 1.5 mm implants (21.9±1.5 μm, P<0.001). The force level at which significance occurred was 1 N. The rotation of the Lomas mini-implants in the form of tipping was significantly higher than that of the Aarhus mini-implants at all force levels. Implant length and diameter become statistically significant influencing parameters on implant stability only when a high force level is applied.
Similar articles
-
Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study.Eur J Orthod. 2011 Aug;33(4):396-401. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq151. Epub 2011 Feb 10. Eur J Orthod. 2011. PMID: 21310766
-
Comparative analysis of numerical and experimental data of orthodontic mini-implants.Eur J Orthod. 2011 Oct;33(5):468-75. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr097. Epub 2011 Aug 17. Eur J Orthod. 2011. PMID: 21852288
-
Stability of connected mini-implants and miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics.Eur J Orthod. 2008 Oct;30(5):483-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm124. Epub 2008 May 4. Eur J Orthod. 2008. PMID: 18458028
-
Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review.Aust Orthod J. 2008 Nov;24(2):140-8. Aust Orthod J. 2008. PMID: 19113080 Review.
-
Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in orthodontics: review of the factors that influence the clinical success rate of the mini-implants.Clin Ter. 2016 May-Jun;167(3):e70-7. doi: 10.7417/CT.2016.1936. Clin Ter. 2016. PMID: 27424513 Review.
Cited by
-
The Influence of the Diameter of Orthodontic Mini-Implants on Primary Stability: Bending Tests-An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;17(13):3149. doi: 10.3390/ma17133149. Materials (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38998232 Free PMC article.
-
Orthodontic mini-implant stability at different insertion depths : Sensitivity of three stability measurement methods.J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0036-2. Epub 2016 Jun 7. J Orofac Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27272055 English.
-
Investigation of the optimal design of orthodontic mini-implants based on the primary stability: A finite element analysis.J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019 Spring;13(2):85-89. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.013. Epub 2019 Aug 14. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019. PMID: 31592304 Free PMC article.
-
A Mini-review on the Effect of Mini-implants on Contemporary Orthodontic Science.J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 1):83-7. J Int Oral Health. 2015. PMID: 26225113 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of mini-implant length on stability at the initial healing period: a controlled clinical study.Head Face Med. 2013 Oct 20;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-9-30. Head Face Med. 2013. PMID: 24382059 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources