Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;3(4):353-9.
doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.70746.

Tools for evaluating team performance in simulation-based training

Affiliations

Tools for evaluating team performance in simulation-based training

Michael A Rosen et al. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Teamwork training constitutes one of the core approaches for moving healthcare systems toward increased levels of quality and safety, and simulation provides a powerful method of delivering this training, especially for face-paced and dynamic specialty areas such as Emergency Medicine. Team performance measurement and evaluation plays an integral role in ensuring that simulation-based training for teams (SBTT) is systematic and effective. However, this component of SBTT systems is overlooked frequently. This article addresses this gap by providing a review and practical introduction to the process of developing and implementing evaluation systems in SBTT. First, an overview of team performance evaluation is provided. Second, best practices for measuring team performance in simulation are reviewed. Third, some of the prominent measurement tools in the literature are summarized and discussed relative to the best practices. Subsequently, implications of the review are discussed for the practice of training teamwork in Emergency Medicine.

Keywords: Simulation-based team training; simulation; team evaluation; team performance; team performance measurement; team training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Campbell J, McCloy R, Oppler S, Sager C. A theory of performance. In: Schmitt N, Borman W, editors. Personnel Selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1993. pp. 35–71.
    1. Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manage. 2008;34:410–76.
    1. Salas E, Sims D, Burke CS. Is there a big five in teamwork? Small Group Res. 2005;36:555–99.
    1. Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, Nicholson D, Howse WR. Markers for Enhancing Team Cognition in Complex Environments: The Power of Team Performance Diagnosis. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007;78:B77–85. - PubMed
    1. Cannon-Bowers JA E. S. A framework for developing team performance measures in training. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C, editors. Team performance and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997. pp. 45–62.