Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience
- PMID: 21067747
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.050
Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience
Abstract
Background: Accurate preoperative diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remain difficult.
Objective: To evaluate the utility of EUS in the diagnosis and preoperative evaluation of CCA.
Design: Observational study of prospectively collected data.
Setting: Single tertiary referral hospital in Indianapolis, Indiana.
Patients: Consecutive patients with CCA from January 2003 through October 2009.
Interventions: EUS and EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA).
Main outcome measurements: Sensitivity of EUS for the detection of a tumor and prediction of unresectability compared with CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); sensitivity of EUS-FNA to provide tissue diagnosis, by using surgical pathology as a reference standard.
Results: A total of 228 patients with biliary strictures undergoing EUS were identified. Of these, 81 (mean age 70 years, 45 men) had CCA. Fifty-one patients (63%) had distal and 30 (37%) had proximal CCA. For those with available imaging, tumor detection was superior with EUS compared with triphasic CT (76 of 81 [94%] vs 23 of 75 [30%], respectively; P < .001). MRI identified the tumor in 11 of 26 patients (42%; P = .07 vs EUS). EUS identified CCA in all 51 (100%) distal and 25 (83%) of 30 proximal tumors (P < .01). EUS-FNA (median, 5 passes; range, 1-12 passes) was performed in 74 patients (91%). The overall sensitivity of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of CCA was 73% (95% confidence interval, 62%-82%) and was significantly higher in distal compared with proximal CCA (81% vs 59%, respectively; P = .04). Fifteen tumors were definitely unresectable. EUS correctly identified unresectability in 8 of 15 and correctly identified the 38 of 39 patients with resectable tumors (53% sensitivity and 97% specificity for unresectability). CT and/or MRI failed to detect unresectability in 6 of these 8 patients.
Limitation: Single-center study.
Conclusion: EUS and EUS-FNA are sensitive for the diagnosis of CCA and very specific in predicting unresectability. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA is significantly higher in distal than in proximal CCA.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results.Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Sep;64(3):325-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.064. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006. PMID: 16923477
-
Impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration on postoperative recurrence and survival in cholangiocarcinoma patients.Endoscopy. 2013 Nov;45(11):883-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344760. Epub 2013 Oct 28. Endoscopy. 2013. PMID: 24165813
-
EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study.Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jul;80(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.12.031. Epub 2014 Feb 19. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014. PMID: 24559784 Clinical Trial.
-
Brush Cytology, Forceps Biopsy, or Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling for Diagnosis of Bile Duct Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jul;67(7):3284-3297. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07138-4. Epub 2021 Jul 14. Dig Dis Sci. 2022. PMID: 34263382 Review.
-
Cholangiocarcinoma: Current opinion on clinical practice diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms: A review of the literature and a long-standing experience of a referral center.Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Mar;48(3):231-41. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Nov 28. Dig Liver Dis. 2016. PMID: 26769568 Review.
Cited by
-
Practical review for diagnosis and clinical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 7;26(25):3542-3561. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i25.3542. World J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32742125 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extracellular vesicles in bile: a game changer in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary stenoses?Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017 Dec;6(6):408-410. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.10.01. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017. PMID: 29312977 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Emerging Technologies for the Diagnosis of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Semin Liver Dis. 2018 May;38(2):160-169. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1655775. Epub 2018 Jun 5. Semin Liver Dis. 2018. PMID: 29871021 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improved endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography brush increases diagnostic yield of malignant biliary strictures.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jul 16;6(7):312-7. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i7.312. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014. PMID: 25031790 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jan;13(1):28-37. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.182. Epub 2015 Nov 3. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 26526122 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical