Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;93(1):118-26.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29888. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

Consumption of dietary fat and meat and risk of ovarian cancer in the Netherlands Cohort Study

Affiliations
Free article

Consumption of dietary fat and meat and risk of ovarian cancer in the Netherlands Cohort Study

Anne M J Gilsing et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Evidence that links dietary factors to ovarian cancer is conflicting, but several epidemiologic studies suggested that consumption of dietary fat and meat may increase risk of ovarian cancer.

Objective: We studied associations of intakes of total fat and sources and subtypes of fat, fresh meat, processed meat, and fish with ovarian cancer risk within the Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS).

Design: The NLCS includes 62,573 postmenopausal women, aged 55-69 y at baseline, who completed a baseline questionnaire on dietary habits and other risk factors for cancer in 1986. After 16.3 y of follow-up, 340 ovarian cancer cases and 2161 subcohort members were available for a case-cohort analysis. Multivariable rate ratios (RRs) were adjusted for age at baseline, total energy intake, oral contraceptive use, and parity.

Results: There were no clear associations between intakes of total fat, saturated fat, mono- and polyunsaturated fats, animal fat, plant-based fat, dairy fat, other fat sources, fresh meat, processed meat, and fish and ovarian cancer risk. There was a positive association between consumption of trans unsaturated fatty acids and ovarian cancer risk. The multivariable RR for women in the highest compared with the lowest quintiles of intake was 1.51 (95% CI: 1.04, 2.20; P for trend = 0.01). Although no significant interactions by oral contraceptive use or parity were shown, effect sizes were generally more pronounced and significant in women who never used oral contraceptives and in parous women.

Conclusion: This prospective study suggests that trans unsaturated fatty acids, but no other types of fat or meat, are associated with increased ovarian cancer risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources