Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;113(11):908-14.
doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1881-x.

[Recommendations for the administration of conventional and new antithrombotic agents from the perspective of anesthesiology]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Recommendations for the administration of conventional and new antithrombotic agents from the perspective of anesthesiology]

[Article in German]
W Gogarten et al. Unfallchirurg. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Neuraxial blockade confers benefits to surgical patients not only due to the high analgesic quality but also through a reduction in postoperative complications, such as respiratory insufficiency and a shortening of postoperative paralytic ileus. In orthopedic surgery peripheral and neuraxial blockades are extensively used to enhance postoperative mobilization. The most serious complication of neuraxial blockade is spinal epidural hematoma, which may lead to permanent paraplegia if left untreated. The risk is enhanced in patients receiving thromboembolism prophylaxis. Most national societies have issued guidelines with specific time intervals between application of antithrombotic drugs and subsequent neuraxial blockade to minimize this risk. From the viewpoint of an anesthesiologist it is preferable to start with chemical thromboembolism prophylaxis postoperatively as opposed to preoperatively, to administer all drugs in the evening and to limit the number of available drugs at each site. The safety of neuraxial blockade in the presence of the new oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban is currently unknown due to limited experience and dabigatran is considered contraindicated with indwelling epidural catheters according to the manufacturer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur Heart J. 2009 Nov;30(22):2769-812 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 6;361(6):594-604 - PubMed
    1. Anaesthesist. 2008 Mar;57(3):242-50 - PubMed
    1. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Dec;101(6):832-40 - PubMed
    1. Anaesthesist. 2009 Dec;58(12):1252-5 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources