Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer with increased nodal yield
- PMID: 21070571
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09789.x
Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer with increased nodal yield
Abstract
Study type: Therapy (case series).
Level of evidence: 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The standard of care for invasive bladder cancer is open radical cystectomy with the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection impacting oncological outcomes. Scepticism remains regarding whether an adequate node dissection can be performed in minimally-invasive fashion as previously reported nodal yields of laparoscopic or robotic lymphadenectomy are well below those reported with open surgery. This study demonstrates that extended pelvic lymphadenectomy can be performed robotically with equivalent nodal yields to open series from centres of excellence.
Objective: To report our initial experience with robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) using a standardized open template.
Patients and methods: In total, 15 consecutive patients underwent robotic radical cystectomy at a single center by a single surgeon using a standard dissection template. Operating time, time to perform ePLND, pathological stage, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, number of nodes obtained and nodal positivity were assessed. Postoperative complications and re-admissions were reviewed.
Results: The mean (range) age and body mass index was 66 (46-87) years and 29 (22-43) kg/m2, respectively. The mean (range) operating time and ePLND time was 423 (300-506) min and 107 (66-160) min. Mean (range) estimated blood loss was 160 (50-500) mL. The mean (range) and median length of hospital stay were 3.4 (3-7) days and 3 days, respectively. The mean (range) nodal yield was 41.8 (18-67) nodes, with greater than 25 nodes in 13 patients. Three patients were found to have nodal positivity. Of the fifteen patients, four received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two patients were re-admitted for postoperative complications within 30 days. There were no complications directly resulting from the ePLND.
Conclusions: Robot-assisted ePLND at the time of cystectomy can be safely and effectively performed on the robotic platform with comparable nodal yields to open series at centers of excellence for cystectomy. Nodal yields are likely to comprise a factor related to the effort of the surgeon, and not the method by which the lymphadenectomy is performed.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer--where have we reached by 2009.Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.020. Epub 2010 Jan 29. Urology. 2010. PMID: 20110111 Review.
-
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute.Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.037. Urology. 2007. PMID: 17382147
-
Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.160. Epub 2007 Aug 14. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17698113
-
Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and outcomes.Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Oct 20. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22036642
-
Lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: the issue of extent and feasibility in the minimally invasive era.Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Dec;9(12):1783-92. doi: 10.1586/era.09.147. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009. PMID: 19954290 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of robotic-assisted and open radical cystectomy in a community-based, non-tertiary health care setting.J Robot Surg. 2013 Dec;7(4):359-63. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0401-8. Epub 2013 Apr 16. J Robot Surg. 2013. PMID: 27001875
-
Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) in 2012.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;3(2):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s13193-012-0123-9. Epub 2012 Feb 16. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 23730095 Free PMC article.
-
Lymphadenectomy with robotic cystectomy.Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Feb;14(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0288-3. Curr Urol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23138180 Review.
-
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review.J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):321-333. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01174-4. Epub 2020 Nov 22. J Robot Surg. 2021. PMID: 33222043
-
Prevention and management of complications following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: lessons learned after >250 consecutive cases.World J Urol. 2013 Jun;31(3):441-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-1007-x. Epub 2012 Dec 27. World J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23269587 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials