Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov 11;4(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-4-17.

The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study

Joerg Doerfer et al. Patient Saf Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: This study was designed to analyze whether routine radiological controls of anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract an early detection of anastomotic leaks.

Patients and methods: 135 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal tract surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in the first group (n = 55) underwent routine radiological control of the anastomoses. In the second group (n = 80) the radiological control was only performed in case of clinical symptoms or signs of anastomotic leaks.

Results: The incidence of anastomotic leaks in the patients seen by us was 5.2%, equivalent to 7 of 135 patients In Group 1 leaks were seen in 4 of 55 patients (7,2%) in group 2 leaks were seen in 3 of 80 (3,8%). The radiological control of the anastomoses with contrast swallow showed the leakage in two cases. Twice the results were false negative. The sensitivity of computed tomography was 100%.

Discussion: Routine radiological control of anastomoses with contrast swallow only has low sensitivity. This procedure should not be performed routinely any more.The radiological control should be used in cases with signs of anastomotic leakage or with postoperatively impaired gastrointestinal passage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Borst HG, Dragajevic D, Stegmann T, Hetzer R. Anastomotic leakage, stenosis and reflux after esophageal replacement. World J Surg. 1978;2:861–866. doi: 10.1007/BF01556541. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cordeiro PG, Shah K, Santamaria E, Gollub MJ, Singh B, Shah J. Barium swallows after free jejunal transfer: should they be performed routinely? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(4):1167–1175. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199904040-00010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gervais DA, del-Castillo CF, o'Neill MJ, Hahn PF, Mueller PR. Complications after pancreatduodenectomy: Imaging and imaging-guided interventional procedures. RSNA 1999/Radiographics. 2001;21:673–690. - PubMed
    1. Ginai AZ. Clinical use of Hexabrix for radiological evaluation on leakage from the upper gastrointestinal tract based on experimental study. Br J Radiol. 1987;60:343–346. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-60-712-343. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Junginger T, Walgenbach S, Pichlmaier H. Circular stapling anastomosis (EEA) following gastrectomy. Chirurg. 1983;54(3):161–165. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources