Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jan 1;173(1):118-26.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq322. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies

Lynda F Voigt  1 , Stephen M Schwartz, David R Doody, Spencer C Lee, Christopher I Li
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies

Lynda F Voigt et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

The usefulness of landline random digit dialing (RDD) in epidemiologic studies is threatened by the rapid increase in households with only cellular telephone service. This study assessed the feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in RDD and differences between young adults with landline telephones and those with only cellular telephones. Between 2008 and 2009, a total of 9,023 cellular telephone numbers were called and 43.8% were successfully screened; 248 men and 249 women who resided in 3 Washington State counties, were 20-44 years of age, and used only cellular telephones were interviewed. They were compared with 332 men and 526 women with landline telephones interviewed as controls for 2 case-control studies conducted in parallel with cellular telephone interviewing. Cellular-only users were more likely to be college educated and less likely to have fathered/birthed a child than were their landline counterparts. Male cellular-only users were less likely to be obese and more likely to exercise, to be Hispanic, and to have lower incomes, while female cellular-only users were more likely to be single than landline respondents. Including cellular telephone numbers in RDD is feasible and should be incorporated into epidemiologic studies that rely on this method to ascertain subjects, although low screening rates could hamper the representativeness of such a sample.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lavrakas PJ, Shuttles CD, Steeh C, et al. The state of surveying cell phone numbers in the United States: 2007 and beyond. Public Opin Q. 2007;71(5):840–854.
    1. Voigt LF. Use of random digit dialing to recruit representative population samples. In: Roberts AR, Yeager K, editors. Evidence-Based Practice Manual: Research and Outcome Measures in Health and Human Services. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2004. pp. 410–419.
    1. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML, et al. Recent trends in household telephone coverage in the United States. In: Lepkowski JM, Tucker C, Brick JM, et al., editors. Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2008. pp. 56–86.
    1. Frankel MR, Battaglia MP, Link M, et al. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, Salt Lake City, UT, July 29–August 2, 2007. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association; 2007. Integrating cell phone numbers into random digit-dialed (RDD) landline surveys. ( http://www.amstat.org/Sections/Srms/Proceedings/)
    1. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January–December, 2007. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2009. ( http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr014.pdf) - PubMed

Publication types