Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug 9:2:211-20.
doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s6914.

Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device

Affiliations

Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device

Bliss Kaneshiro et al. Int J Womens Health. .

Abstract

The intrauterine device (IUD), primarily in the form of the copper IUD, is used by more than 150 million women around the world, making it the most widely used reversible method of contraception. With a remarkably low failure rate of less than 1 per 100 women in the first year of use, the Copper T-380A is in the top tier of contraceptives in terms of efficacy. Risks of utilization include perforation and an increased risk of infection in the first 20 days following insertion. Overall, the number of adverse events is low, making the Copper T-380A a very safe contraceptive method. The most common reasons for the discontinuation of this method are menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea. However, cumulative discontinuation rates of Copper T-380A are lower than that have been reported for other methods, indicating that the Copper T-380A is highly acceptable to women. After 5 years, approximately 50% of all women, who have a Copper T-380A inserted, will continue to use this highly effective contraceptive method.

Keywords: continuation; contraception; expulsion; pelvic inflammatory disease; perforation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Previous use of contraceptives and risk of tubal occlusion presented as odds ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals. Note: Women with no previous use of contraception, rhythm method or withdrawal comprised the reference group. Hormonal methods only included oral contraceptives or injectables. From data of Hubacher et al 2001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. d’Arcangues C. Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception. Contraception. 2007;75:S2–S7. - PubMed
    1. Fischer W. 50-year record of scientifically founded use of IUD – in memorian Ernst Grafenberg (author’s transl) Zentralbl Gynakol. 1979;101:929–932. - PubMed
    1. Burnhill MS. The rise and fall and rise of the IUD. Am J Gynecol Health. 1989;3:6–10. - PubMed
    1. Ota T. A study on the birth control with an intrauterine instrument. Jpn J Obstet Gynecol. 1934;17:210–214. - PubMed
    1. Speroff L, Darney PD. A Clinical Guide for Contraception. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005.