Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2-result
- PMID: 21072753
- DOI: 10.1002/pon.1864
Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2-result
Abstract
Background: It has been hypothesized that the Outcomes of DNA testing (O) are better predicted and/or mediated by the counselees' Perception P) than by the actually communicated genetic Information (I). In this study, we aimed at quantifying the effect that perception has in genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.
Methods: Two hundred and four women, who had previously been tested for BRCA1/2, participated in a retrospective questionnaire study; 93% had cancer. Communicated Information (I) consisted of cancer risks and BRCA1/2 test result category: unclassified variant (n = 76), uninformative (n = 76), pathogenic mutation (n = 51). Four perception variables (P) were included: the counselees' recollections and interpretations of both the cancer risks and the likelihood that the cancer in their family is heritable. The Outcome variables (O) included life changes, counselees' medical decisions, BRCA-related self-concept, current psychological well-being, and quality-of-life. Bootstrap mediation analyses determined whether relationships were direct (I→O or P→O) or indirect through the mediation of perception (I→P→O).
Results: The actually communicated pathogenic mutation and uninformative result directly predicted medical decisions (I→O), i.e. intended and performed surgery of breasts/ovaries. All other outcomes were only directly predicted by the counselees' perception (recollection and interpretation) of their cancer risks and heredity likelihood (P→O), or this perception mediated the outcome (I→P→O). However, this perception was significantly different from the actually communicated cancer risks (I→P). Unclassified variants were inaccurately perceived (mostly overestimated); this misperception predicted both psychological outcomes and radical medical decisions.
Discussion: Genetic counselors need to explicitly address the counselee's interpretations and intended medical decisions. In case of misinterpretations, additional counseling might be offered. Communication of unclassified variants needs special attention given the pitfall of overestimation of risk.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: the counselees' perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not.Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):239-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.017. Epub 2011 Dec 27. Patient Educ Couns. 2012. PMID: 21684708
-
Perceiving cancer-risks and heredity-likelihood in genetic-counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA 1/2-test results.Clin Genet. 2011 Mar;79(3):207-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01581.x. Epub 2010 Nov 28. Clin Genet. 2011. PMID: 21114486
-
Genetic counseling does not fulfill the counselees' need for certainty in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families: an explorative assessment.Psychooncology. 2013 May;22(5):1167-76. doi: 10.1002/pon.3125. Epub 2012 Jul 9. Psychooncology. 2013. PMID: 22777929
-
Attitudes and psychological impact of genetic testing, genetic counseling, and breast cancer risk assessment among women at increased risk.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Mar-Apr;30(2):241-6. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.241-246. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003. PMID: 12692658 Review.
-
[Cognitive, emotional and behavioral impact of an uncertain outcome after study of BRCA1/2: review of the literature].Bull Cancer. 2011 Feb;98(2):184-98. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2011.1309. Bull Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21382771 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Experiences and interpretations of BRCA1/2 testing among women affected by breast or ovarian cancer who received a negative result.J Community Genet. 2019 Oct;10(4):501-514. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00415-w. Epub 2019 Mar 27. J Community Genet. 2019. PMID: 30919324 Free PMC article.
-
Living With Genetic Vulnerability: a Life Course Perspective.J Genet Couns. 2016 Feb;25(1):49-61. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9877-x. Epub 2015 Sep 2. J Genet Couns. 2016. PMID: 26323596
-
Making Sense of a Health Threat: Illness Representations, Coping, and Psychological Distress among BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.Genes (Basel). 2021 May 14;12(5):741. doi: 10.3390/genes12050741. Genes (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34069035 Free PMC article.
-
How can psychological science inform research about genetic counseling for clinical genomic sequencing?J Genet Couns. 2015 Apr;24(2):193-204. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9804-6. Epub 2014 Dec 9. J Genet Couns. 2015. PMID: 25488723 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosocial impact of prognostic genetic testing in the care of uveal melanoma patients: protocol of a controlled prospective clinical observational study.BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 7;16:408. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2479-7. BMC Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27386847 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous