The role of robotic assisted laparoscopy for oesophagogastric oncological resection; an appraisal of the literature
- PMID: 21073622
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01129.x
The role of robotic assisted laparoscopy for oesophagogastric oncological resection; an appraisal of the literature
Abstract
The introduction of surgical robotics to the field of surgical oncology brings with it an expectation not only of improved vision, instrumentation, and precision but also as a result, a potential for improved oncological outcomes. The current interest in the field of oesophagogastric oncology is explored in this review together with the benefits, real and potential, that robotic assistance offers surgical cancer resection as well as some of the limiting factors which may be hampering its uptake into current surgical practice. A systematic review of all the published literature up until April 2010 was examined across the field of esophageal and gastric cancer resection. A quantitative assessment of the oncological, operative, and functional outcomes was determined from each procedure. The level of evidence behind the results was determined using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence; Therapy and Prevention. Three hundred and five cases from 19 independent studies were included for review. Nine studies explored the outcomes from robotic-assisted esophagectomy and eight, the robotic-assisted gastrectomy. Two articles included small case series of both procedures. The level of evidence was predominantly based on case series or expert opinion (Level 4 or 5) with only three unmatched or poorly matched comparative trials (Level 4) with no randomized trials evident. Improved operative outcomes and hospital stays were demonstrated with a reduction of 2 days when the robotic-assisted gastrectomy technique was employed compared with the open. No improvement in oncological outcomes could be identified with the use of the robot for either oesophageal or gastric cancer resection; however, in terms of short-term oncological outcomes, these were at least equivalent to the open approach for oesophageal cancer and early stage gastric cancer. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is a feasible technique to use to perform a safe and oncologically sound resection for oesophageal and early gastric cancer. Operative benefits appear to be encouragingly similar to the laparoscopic approach with some demonstration of improvement over the open technique despite a prolonged operative time. However, the level of evidence is suboptimal and more randomized controlled trials and long-term survival studies within a framework of measured and comparable outcomes is required.
© 2010 Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.
Similar articles
-
Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(41):1-313. doi: 10.3310/hta16410. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 23127367 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 17083853
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 2495 patients.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Dec;23(12):965-76. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0279. Epub 2013 Oct 5. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013. PMID: 24093968
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic approach to gastrointestinal malignancies: toward the future with caution.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 21;20(7):1777-89. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1777. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24587655 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Esophageal surgery in minimally invasive era.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan 27;8(1):52-64. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i1.52. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016. PMID: 26843913 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robot-assisted gastroesophageal surgery: usefulness and limitations.J Robot Surg. 2014 Jun;8(2):111-8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0435-y. Epub 2013 Sep 14. J Robot Surg. 2014. PMID: 27637520
-
Robotic thoracic surgery: The state of the art.J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):60-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147693. J Minim Access Surg. 2015. PMID: 25598601 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;66(4):225-231. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y. Epub 2018 Feb 3. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29397486
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous