Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Nov 13:10:79.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-79.

Interactive seminars or small group tutorials in preclinical medical education: results of a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Interactive seminars or small group tutorials in preclinical medical education: results of a randomized controlled trial

Zuzana de Jong et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Learning in small group tutorials is appreciated by students and effective in the acquisition of clinical problem-solving skills but poses financial and resource challenges. Interactive seminars, which accommodate large groups, might be an alternative. This study examines the educational effectiveness of small group tutorials and interactive seminars and students' preferences for and satisfaction with these formats.

Methods: Students in year three of the Leiden undergraduate medical curriculum, who agreed to participate in a randomized controlled trial (RCT, n = 107), were randomly allocated to small group tutorials (n = 53) or interactive seminars (n = 54). Students who did not agree were free to choose either format (n = 105). Educational effectiveness was measured by comparing the participants' results on the end-of-block test. Data on students' reasons and satisfaction were collected by means of questionnaires. Data was analyzed using student unpaired t test or chi-square test where appropriate.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two educational formats in students' test grades. Retention of knowledge through active participation was the most frequently cited reason for preferring small group tutorials, while a dislike of compulsory course components was mentioned more frequently by students preferring interactive seminars. Small group tutorials led to greater satisfaction.

Conclusions: We found that small group tutorials leads to greater satisfaction but not to better learning results. Interactive learning in large groups might be might be an effective alternative to small group tutorials in some cases and be offered as an option.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile. Legend figure 1. Potential participants = Students who were eligible to undertake the MusculoSkeletal Problems (MSP) block. RCT participants = Students who agreed to participate in the Randomized Controlled Trial. Non-RCT participants = Students who were free to choose between small group tutorials and interactive seminars and completed at least one of the questionnaires. Non-responders = Students who did not participate in the RCT and did not complete any of the questionnaires. End-of-block exam = End-of-block test on MusculoSkeletal Problems

References

    1. Mamede S, Schmidt HG, Norman GR. Innovations in problem-based learning: what can we learn from recent studies? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;11(4):403–22. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9018-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dolmans DH, Schmidt HG. What do we know about cognitive and motivational effects of small group tutorials in problem-based learning? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;11(4):321–36. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9012-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Grave WS, Boshuizen HPA, Schmidt HG. Problem-based learning: cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science. 1996;24:321–341. doi: 10.1007/BF00118111. - DOI
    1. De Grave WS, Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HPA. Effects of problem-based discussion in studying a subsequent text: a randomized trial among first year medical students. Instructional Science. 2001;29:33–44. doi: 10.1023/A:1026571615672. - DOI
    1. Visschers-Pleijers AJ, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten. Exploration of a method to analyze group interactions in problem-based learning. Med Teach. 2004;26(5):471–8. doi: 10.1080/01421590410001679064. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources