Continuing education course #3: current practices and future trends in neuropathology assessment for developmental neurotoxicity testing
- PMID: 21075916
- PMCID: PMC3508706
- DOI: 10.1177/0192623310386247
Continuing education course #3: current practices and future trends in neuropathology assessment for developmental neurotoxicity testing
Abstract
The continuing education course on Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing (DNT) was designed to communicate current practices for DNT neuropathology, describe promising innovations in quantitative analysis and noninvasive imaging, and facilitate a discussion among experienced neuropathologists and regulatory scientists regarding suitable DNT practices. Conventional DNT neuropathology endpoints are qualitative histopathology and morphometric endpoints of particularly vulnerable sites (e.g., cerebral, cerebellar, or hippocampal thickness). Novel imaging and stereology measurements hold promise for automated analysis of factors that cannot be effectively examined in routinely processed specimens (e.g., cell numbers, fiber tract integrity). The panel recommended that dedicated DNT neuropathology data sets be acquired on a minimum of 8 sections (for qualitative assessment) or 3 sections (for quantitative linear and stereological analyses) using a small battery of stains to examine neurons and myelin. Where guidelines permit discretion, immersion fixation is acceptable for younger animals (postnatal day 22 or earlier), and peripheral nerves may be embedded in paraffin. Frequent concerns regarding DNT data sets include false-negative outcomes due to processing difficulties (e.g., lack of concordance among sections from different animals) and insensitive analytical endpoints (e.g., qualitative evaluation) as well as false-positive results arising from overinterpretation or misreading by inexperienced pathologists.
Similar articles
-
Recommendations for harmonization of data collection and analysis of developmental neurotoxicity endpoints in regulatory guideline studies: Proceedings of workshops presented at Society of Toxicology and joint Teratology Society and Neurobehavioral Teratology Society meetings.Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2017 Sep;63:24-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 27. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2017. PMID: 28757310 Free PMC article.
-
A 'best practices' approach to neuropathologic assessment in developmental neurotoxicity testing--for today.Toxicol Pathol. 2006;34(3):296-313. doi: 10.1080/01926230600713269. Toxicol Pathol. 2006. PMID: 16698729
-
Recommended Methods for Brain Processing and Quantitative Analysis in Rodent Developmental Neurotoxicity Studies.Toxicol Pathol. 2016 Jan;44(1):14-42. doi: 10.1177/0192623315596858. Epub 2015 Aug 21. Toxicol Pathol. 2016. PMID: 26296631
-
A qualitative retrospective analysis of positive control data in developmental neurotoxicity studies.Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2004.02.007. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004. PMID: 15113596 Review.
-
Current problems of in vivo developmental neurotoxicity tests and a new in vivo approach focusing on each step of the developing central nervous system.Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2012 Sep;52(3):129-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4520.2012.00376.x. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2012. PMID: 22925213 Review.
Cited by
-
A critical review of neonicotinoid insecticides for developmental neurotoxicity.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016 Feb;46(2):153-90. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2015.1090948. Epub 2015 Oct 29. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016. PMID: 26513508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recommendations for harmonization of data collection and analysis of developmental neurotoxicity endpoints in regulatory guideline studies: Proceedings of workshops presented at Society of Toxicology and joint Teratology Society and Neurobehavioral Teratology Society meetings.Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2017 Sep;63:24-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 27. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2017. PMID: 28757310 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bearer CF. Developmental neurotoxicity: illustration of principles. Pediatr Clin N Am: Children’s Environ Health. 2001;48:1199–1213. - PubMed
-
- Bolon B, Bradley A, Butt M, Jensen K, Krinke G, Mellon RD. Compilation of International Regulatory Guidance Documents for Neuropathology Assessment During Nonclinical General Toxicity and Specialized Neurotoxicity Studies. Toxicol Pathol. 2011;39:92–96. - PubMed
-
- Bolon B, Garman R, Jensen K, Krinke G, Stuart B. A “best practices” approach to neuropathologic assessment in developmental neurotoxicity testing—for today. Toxicol Pathol. 2006;34:296–313. - PubMed
-
- Castoldi AF, Johansson C, Onishchenko N, Coccini T, Roda E, Vahter M, Ceccatelli S, Manzo L. Human developmental neurotoxicity of methylmercury: impact of variables and risk modifiers. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;51:201–14. - PubMed
-
- Claudio L, Kwa WC, Russell AL, Wallinga D. Testing methods for developmental neurotoxicity of environmental chemicals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2000;164:1–14. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical