Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;29(5):272-9.
doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181fc3e59.

Use of a computer-mediated Delphi process to validate a mass casualty conceptual model

Affiliations

Use of a computer-mediated Delphi process to validate a mass casualty conceptual model

Joan M Culley. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011 May.

Abstract

Since the original work on the Delphi technique, multiple versions have been developed and used in research and industry; however, very little empirical research has been conducted that evaluates the efficacy of using online computer, Internet, and e-mail applications to facilitate a Delphi method that can be used to validate theoretical models. The purpose of this research was to develop computer, Internet, and e-mail applications to facilitate a modified Delphi technique through which experts provide validation for a proposed conceptual model that describes the information needs for a mass-casualty continuum of care. Extant literature and existing theoretical models provided the basis for model development. Two rounds of the Delphi process were needed to satisfy the criteria for consensus and/or stability related to the constructs, relationships, and indicators in the model. The majority of experts rated the online processes favorably (mean of 6.1 on a seven-point scale). Using online Internet and computer applications to facilitate a modified Delphi process offers much promise for future research involving model building or validation. The online Delphi process provided an effective methodology for identifying and describing the complex series of events and contextual factors that influence the way we respond to disasters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mass Casualty Conceptual Model. Reprinted with permission from the author.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Example of changes to the workforce construct based on input from rounds 1 and 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rowe G, Wright G, Bolger F. Delphi: a reevaluation of research and theory. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1991;39:235–251.
    1. Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage Sci. 1963;9:458–467.
    1. Goodman CM. The Delphi technique: a critique. J Adv Nurs. 1987;(12):729–734. - PubMed
    1. Snyder-Halpern R, Thompson CP, Schaffer J. Comparison of mailed vs. Internet applications of the Delphi technique in clinical informatics research. Proc Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000:809–813. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. [Accessed April 1, 2007];BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 5:37. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1318466. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types