Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Sep-Oct;4(5):435-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2010.07.007.

Achieving lipid targets in adults with type 2 diabetes: the Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Achieving lipid targets in adults with type 2 diabetes: the Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study

Marie Russell et al. J Clin Lipidol. 2010 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Although lipid management in diabetes is standard practice, goals often are neither met nor maintained. Strategies for achieving lower targets have not been explored. The Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study randomized patients with diabetes to standard versus aggressive lipid and blood pressure goals for 36 months.

Objective: To report strategies used to achieve and maintain lipid goals and to report adverse events (AEs).

Methods: Adults with type 2 diabetes and no history of cardiovascular disease (N = 499) were randomized to standard (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] ≤ 100 mg/dL, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [non-HDL-C] ≤ 130 mg/dL) or aggressive (LDL-C ≤ 70 mg/dL, non-HDL-C ≤ 100 mg/dL) targets. An algorithm was started with statin monotherapy, with intestinally acting agents added as required to reach LDL-C targets.Triglyceride [TG]-lowering agents were next used to reach non-HDL-C goals. Lipid management was performed by mid-level practitioners, with physician consultation, by the use of point-of-care lipid determinations.

Results: On average, both groups achieved the LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals within 12 months and maintained them throughout the study. At 36 months, mean (SD) LDL-C and non-HDL-C were 72 (24) and 102 (29) mg/dL in the aggressive group (AGG) and 104 (20) and 138 (26) mg/dL, respectively, in the standard group (STD); systolic blood pressure targets were 115 and 130 mmHg, respectively. A total of 68% of participants reached target LDL-C for greater than 50% of the visits and 46% for greater than 75% of visits. At 36 months, the AGG averaged 1.5 lipid lowering medications and the STD 1.2. Statins were used in 91% and 68% of the AGG and STD; ezetimibe by 31% and 10%; fibrates by 8% and 18%. No serious AEs were observed; AEs occurred in 18% of the AGG and 14% of the STD.

Conclusion: Standard and aggressive lipid targets can be safely maintained in diabetic patients. Standardized algorithms, point-of-care lipid testing, and nonphysician providers facilitate care delivery.

Keywords: American Indians; blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; carotid artery intima media thickness; lipids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: Dr. B.V. Howard has served on the advisory boards of Merck/Schering Plough and has received research support from Merck/Schering Plough. Dr. Wm. J. Howard has received research support as part of multicenter trials from Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Merck, and Schering Plough; has served as a consultant for Merck, Schering Plough, and Pfizer; and has served on the speaker’s bureau for Merck, Schering Plough, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Abbott, and Daiichi Sankyo. The other authors have nothing to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Algorithm for Lipid Management LDL-C therapy: aggressive target <70 mg/dL; standard target <100 mg/dL
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of Point-of–Care LDL Cholesterol with Central Laboratory Measures
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lipid Goal Achievement
a. Mean (SD) of LDL Cholesterol by Treatment Group b. Mean (SD) of Non-HDL Cholesterol by Treatment Group

References

    1. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and glucose tolerance as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: The Framingham Study. Diabetes Care. 1979;2:120–126. - PubMed
    1. Kleinman JC, Donahue RP, Harris MI, Finucane FF, Madans JH, Brock DB. Mortality among diabetics in a national sample. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128:389–401. - PubMed
    1. Butler WJ, Ostrander LD, Can11an WJ, Lamphiear DE. Mortality from coronary heart disease in the Tecumseh Study: Long-term effect of diabetes mellitus, glucose tolerance and other risk factors. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:541–547. - PubMed
    1. Howard BV. Macrovascular complications of diabetes mellitus. In: LeRoith D, Taylor SI, Olefs JM, editors. Diabetes Mellitus. Lippincott-Raven; Philadelphia: 1996. pp. 792–797.
    1. Klein R. Kelly West Lecture 1994. Hyperglycemia and microvascular and macrovascular disease in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:258–268. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms