Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov 1;42(11):1911-1923.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.07.021.

Size Does Matter: Application-driven Approaches for Soil Metagenomics

Affiliations

Size Does Matter: Application-driven Approaches for Soil Metagenomics

Kavita S Kakirde et al. Soil Biol Biochem. .

Abstract

Metagenomic analyses can provide extensive information on the structure, composition, and predicted gene functions of diverse environmental microbial assemblages. Each environment presents its own unique challenges to metagenomic investigation and requires a specifically designed approach to accommodate physicochemical and biotic factors unique to each environment that can pose technical hurdles and/or bias the metagenomic analyses. In particular, soils harbor an exceptional diversity of prokaryotes that are largely undescribed beyond the level of ribotype and are a potentially vast resource for natural product discovery. The successful application of a soil metagenomic approach depends on selecting the appropriate DNA extraction, purification, and if necessary, cloning methods for the intended downstream analyses. The most important technical considerations in a metagenomic study include obtaining a sufficient yield of high-purity DNA representing the targeted microorganisms within an environmental sample or enrichment and (if required) constructing a metagenomic library in a suitable vector and host. Size does matter in the context of the average insert size within a clone library or the sequence read length for a high-throughput sequencing approach. It is also imperative to select the appropriate metagenomic screening strategy to address the specific question(s) of interest, which should drive the selection of methods used in the earlier stages of a metagenomic project (e.g., DNA size, to clone or not to clone). Here, we present both the promising and problematic nature of soil metagenomics and discuss the factors that should be considered when selecting soil sampling, DNA extraction, purification, and cloning methods to implement based on the ultimate study objectives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure – 1
Figure – 1
Schematic representation of the steps involved in construction of metagenomic libraries

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aakvik T, Degnes KF, Dahlsrud R, Schmidt F, Dam R, Yu L, Volker U, Ellingsen TE, Valla S. A plasmid RK2-based broad-host-range cloning vector useful for transfer of metagenomic libraries to a variety of bacterial species. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2009;296:149–58. - PubMed
    1. Altshuler ML. PCR troubleshooting, the essential guide. 1st ed Caister Academic Press; Wymondham, Norfolk (UK): 2006.
    1. Bakken LR, Lindahl V. Recovery of bacterial cells from soil. In: Trevors JT, Van Elsas JD, editors. Nucleic Acids in the Environment. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 1995. pp. 13–27.
    1. Beja O, Suzuki MT, Koonin EV, Aravind L, Hadd A, Nguyen LP, Villacorta R, Amjadi M, Garrigues C, Jovanovich SB, Feldman RA, DeLong EF. Construction and analysis of bacterial artificial chromosome libraries from a marine microbial assemblage. Environmental Microbiology. 2000a;2:516–29. - PubMed
    1. Beja O, Aravind L, Koonin EV, Suzuki MT, Hadd A, Nguyen LP, Jovanovich SB, Gates CM, Feldman RA, Spudich JL, Spudich EN, DeLong EF. Bacterial rhodopsin, evidence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea. Science. 2000b;289:1902–6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources