Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the performance of prospectively electrocardiographically (ECG)-triggered axial computed tomography (CT) angiography with retrospective technique in evaluating coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice CT.

Materials and methods: A pulsing cardiac phantom with artificial coronary artery in-stent restenosis was examined by CT angiography with different types of scan modes. The visibility of in-stent restenosis was evaluated with a three-point score. Artificial lumen narrowing [(inner stent diameter-measured lumen diameter)/inner stent diameter], lumen attenuation increase ratio [(in-stent attenuation-coronary artery lumen attenuation)/coronary artery lumen attenuation], measurement error of restenosis percent [(known restenosis percent-measured restenosis percent)/known restenosis percent] and imaging noise were analysed.

Results: Prospective acquisition showed better visibility than retrospective acquisition (p<0.05): 61% of in-stent restenoses had good visibility on the prospective acquisition compared with 17% on the retrospective acquisition. Furthermore, the effective dose was 6.2 ± 0.3 mSv for the prospective technique compared with 18.8 ± 1.1 mSv for the retrospective technique. Artificial lumen narrowing (mean 40%), lumen attenuation increase ratio (mean 33%) and measurement error of restenosis percent were not different between types of CT acquisitions.

Conclusions: Compared with the traditional retrospective technique, prospective coronary CT angiography offers improved image quality and reduces effective radiation dose in evaluating in-stent restenosis.