Evaluating an evidence-based bundle for preventing surgical site infection: a randomized trial
- PMID: 21079110
- DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.249
Evaluating an evidence-based bundle for preventing surgical site infection: a randomized trial
Abstract
Objective: To determine if an evidence-based practice bundle would result in a significantly lower rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) when compared with standard practice.
Design: Single-institution, randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of main outcome. The trial opened in April 2007 and was closed in January 2010.
Setting: Veterans Administration teaching hospital.
Patients: Patients who required elective transabdominal colorectal surgery were eligible. A total of 241 subjects were approached, 211 subjects were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 interventions, and 197 were included in an intention-to-treat analysis.
Interventions: Subjects received either a combination of 5 evidenced-based practices (extended arm) or were treated according to our current practice (standard arm). The interventions in the extended arm included (1) omission of mechanical bowel preparation; (2) preoperative and intraoperative warming; (3) supplemental oxygen during and immediately after surgery; (4) intraoperative intravenous fluid restriction; and (5) use of a surgical wound protector.
Main outcome measure: Overall SSI rate at 30 days assessed by blinded infection control coordinators using standardized definitions.
Results: The overall rate of SSI was 45% in the extended arm of the study and 24% in the standard arm (P = .003). Most of the increased number of infections in the extended arm were superficial incisional SSIs (36% extended arm vs 19% standard arm; P = .004). Multivariate analysis suggested that allocation to the extended arm of the trial conferred a 2.49-fold risk (95% confidence interval, 1.36-4.56; P = .003) independent of other factors traditionally associated with SSI.
Conclusions: An evidence-based intervention bundle did not reduce SSIs. The bundling of interventions, even when the constituent interventions have been individually tested, does not have a predictable effect on outcome. Formal testing of bundled approaches should occur prior to implementation.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00953784.
Comment in
-
Surgical site infection: still waiting on the revolution.JAMA. 2011 Apr 13;305(14):1478-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.447. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21491663 No abstract available.
-
Too much of a good thing? Multi-tasking and distraction in quality improvement.Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):270. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.7. Arch Surg. 2011. PMID: 21542186 No abstract available.
-
Selection of bundle components.Arch Surg. 2011 Oct;146(10):1220-1; author reply 1221. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.249. Arch Surg. 2011. PMID: 22006886 No abstract available.
-
Re: Evaluating an evidence-based bundle for preventing surgical site infection: a randomized trial.J Urol. 2011 Dec;186(6):2266. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.056. Epub 2011 Oct 26. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 22078592 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous