Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;469(3):732-41.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1674-0.

Spinal cord injury: a systematic review of current treatment options

Affiliations

Spinal cord injury: a systematic review of current treatment options

David W Cadotte et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating event often resulting in permanent neurologic deficit. Research has revealed an understanding of mechanisms that occur after the primary injury and contribute to functional loss. By targeting these secondary mechanisms of injury, clinicians may be able to offer improved recovery after SCI.

Questions/purposes: In this review, we highlight advances in the field of SCI by framing three questions: (1) What is the preclinical evidence for the neuroprotective agent riluzole that has allowed this agent to move into clinical trials? (2) What is the preclinical evidence for Rho antagonists that have allowed this group of compounds to move into clinical trials? (3) What is the evidence for early surgical decompression after SCI?

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE-cited articles related to SCI to address these questions.

Results: As a result of an improved understanding of the secondary mechanisms of SCI, specific clinical strategies have been established. We highlight three strategies that have made their way from bench to bedside: the sodium-glutamate antagonist riluzole, the Rho inhibitor Cethrin, and early surgical decompression. Each of these modalities is under clinical investigation. We highlight the fundamental science that led to this development.

Conclusions: As our understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of SCI improves, we must keep abreast of these discoveries to translate them into therapies that will hopefully benefit patients. We summarize this process of bench to bedside with regard to SCI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aki T, Toya S. Experimental study on changes of the spinal-evoked potential and circulatory dynamics following spinal cord compression and decompression. Spine. 1984;9:800–809. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198411000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albin MS, White RJ. Epidemiology, physiopathology, and experimental therapeutics of acute spinal cord injury. Crit Care Clin. 1987;3:441–452. - PubMed
    1. Ates O, Cayli SR, Gurses I, Turkoz Y, Tarim O, Cakir CO, Kocak A. Comparative neuroprotective effect of sodium channel blockers after experimental spinal cord injury. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14:658–665. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.03.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohlman HH, Bahniuk E, Raskulinecz G, Field G. Mechanical factors affecting recovery from incomplete cervical spinal cord injury: a preliminary report. Johns Hopkins Med J. 1979;145:115–125. - PubMed
    1. Botel U, Glaser E, Niedeggen A. The surgical treatment of acute spinal paralysed patients. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:420–428. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100407. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms