Minimal information about T cell assays: the process of reaching the community of T cell immunologists in cancer and beyond
- PMID: 21080166
- PMCID: PMC3029829
- DOI: 10.1007/s00262-010-0940-z
Minimal information about T cell assays: the process of reaching the community of T cell immunologists in cancer and beyond
Abstract
Many assays to evaluate the nature, breadth, and quality of antigen-specific T cell responses are currently applied in human medicine. In most cases, assay-related protocols are developed on an individual laboratory basis, resulting in a large number of different protocols being applied worldwide. Together with the inherent complexity of cellular assays, this leads to unnecessary limitations in the ability to compare results generated across institutions. Over the past few years a number of critical assay parameters have been identified which influence test performance irrespective of protocol, material, and reagents used. Describing these critical factors as an integral part of any published report will both facilitate the comparison of data generated across institutions and lead to improvements in the assays themselves. To this end, the Minimal Information About T Cell Assays (MIATA) project was initiated. The objective of MIATA is to achieve a broad consensus on which T cell assay parameters should be reported in scientific publications and to propose a mechanism for reporting these in a systematic manner. To add maximum value for the scientific community, a step-wise, open, and field-spanning approach has been taken to achieve technical precision, user-friendliness, adequate incorporation of concerns, and high acceptance among peers. Here, we describe the past, present, and future perspectives of the MIATA project. We suggest that the approach taken can be generically applied to projects in which a broad consensus has to be reached among scientists working in fragmented fields, such as immunology. An additional objective of this undertaking is to engage the broader scientific community to comment on MIATA and to become an active participant in the project.
Figures
References
-
- Finke LH, Wentworth K, Blumenstein B, Rudolph NS, Levitsky H, Hoos A. Lessons from randomized phase III studies with active cancer immunotherapies—outcomes from the 2006 meeting of the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC) Vaccine. 2007;25(Suppl 2):B97–B109. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.06.067. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schuster SJ, Neelapu SS, Gause BL, Muggia FM, Gockerman JP, Sotomayor EM, Winter JN, Flowers CR, Stergiou AM, Kwak LW, For the BiovaxID Phase III Study Investigators Idiotype vaccine therapy (biovaxid) in follicular lymphoma in first complete remission: phase III clinical trial results. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(Suppl; Abstr 2):18s.
-
- Schwartzentruber DJ, Lawson D, Richards J, Conry RM, Miller D, Triesman J, Gailani F, Riley LB, Vena D, Hwu P. A phase III multi-institutional randomized study of immunization with the gp100: 209–217 (210 m) peptide followed by high-dose IL-2 compared with high-dose IL-2 alone in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:18s. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4626. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
