What the literature tells us about listeners' reactions to stuttering: implications for the clinical management of stuttering
- PMID: 21080295
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1265756
What the literature tells us about listeners' reactions to stuttering: implications for the clinical management of stuttering
Abstract
It is known that listeners harbor negative stereotypes toward people who stutter but there are a host of other findings in the literature that provide a broader perspective about how listeners react to stuttering. The focus of this article is a discussion of four areas of research related to listener reactions to stuttering: (1) how stuttering impacts listeners' reactions to mild, moderate, and severe stuttering; (2) how stuttering interferes with listener recall and comprehension of story information; (3) how children react to stuttering; and (4) how listeners react to strategies plus use in stuttering therapy programs. Studies associated with these four areas of research are summarized and discussed. Clinical implications that emerge from these studies are described to assist clinicians in the treatment of children and adults who stutter.
© Thieme Medical Publishers.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating and treating school-aged children who stutter.Semin Speech Lang. 2010 Nov;31(4):262-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265759. Epub 2010 Nov 15. Semin Speech Lang. 2010. PMID: 21080298 Review.
-
The accuracy with which adults who do not stutter predict stuttering-related communication attitudes.J Fluency Disord. 2011 Dec;36(4):334-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jun 12. J Fluency Disord. 2011. PMID: 22133412
-
Listener responses according to stuttering self-acknowledgment and modification.J Fluency Disord. 2010 Jun;35(2):110-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Apr 13. J Fluency Disord. 2010. PMID: 20609332
-
Stuttering treatment for adults: an update on contemporary approaches.Semin Speech Lang. 2010 Nov;31(4):272-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265760. Epub 2010 Nov 15. Semin Speech Lang. 2010. PMID: 21080299 Review.
-
Post-treatment speech naturalness of comprehensive stuttering program clients and differences in ratings among listener groups.J Fluency Disord. 2010 Mar;35(1):44-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Jan 25. J Fluency Disord. 2010. PMID: 20412982
Cited by
-
Temperament in Adults Who Stutter and Its Association With Stuttering Frequency and Quality-of-Life Impacts.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Aug 15;62(8):2691-2702. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0225. Epub 2019 Jul 17. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019. PMID: 31318628 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2906-2923. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0309. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 28973156 Free PMC article.
-
Societal knowledge of stuttering in Saudi population.Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jan;28(1):664-668. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.057. Epub 2020 Nov 4. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33424353 Free PMC article.
-
Backward-Looking Sentence Processing in Typically Disfluent versus Stuttered Speech: ERP Evidence.Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019;34(5):561-579. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1533140. Epub 2018 Oct 9. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31032374 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical