Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries
- PMID: 21080780
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009406
Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries
Abstract
Background: Recent data have suggested that patients with coronary disease in large arteries are at increased risk for late cardiac events after percutaneous intervention with first-generation drug-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents. We sought to confirm this observation and to assess whether this increase in risk was also seen with second-generation drug-eluting stents.
Methods: We randomly assigned 2314 patients needing stents that were 3.0 mm or more in diameter to receive sirolimus-eluting, everolimus-eluting, or bare-metal stents. The primary end point was the composite of death from cardiac causes or nonfatal myocardial infarction at 2 years. Late events (occurring during months 7 to 24) and target-vessel revascularization were the main secondary end points.
Results: The rates of the primary end point were 2.6% among patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents, 3.2% among those receiving everolimus-eluting stents, and 4.8% among those receiving bare-metal stents, with no significant differences between patients receiving either drug-eluting stent and those receiving bare-metal stents. There were also no significant between-group differences in the rate of late events or in the rate of death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. Rates of target-vessel revascularization for reasons unrelated to myocardial infarction were 3.7% among patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents, 3.1% among those receiving everolimus-eluting stents, and 8.9% among those receiving bare-metal stents. The rate of target-vessel revascularization was significantly reduced among patients receiving either drug-eluting stent, as compared with a bare-metal stent, with no significant difference between the two types of drug-eluting stents.
Conclusions: In patients requiring stenting of large coronary arteries, no significant differences were found among sirolimus-eluting, everolimus-eluting, and bare-metal stents with respect to the rate of death or myocardial infarction. With the two drug-eluting stents, similar reductions in rates of target-vessel revascularization were seen. (Funded by the Basel Cardiovascular Research Foundation and the Swiss National Foundation for Research; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN72444640.).
Comment in
-
Interventional cardiology: DES safe in large arteries.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Jan;8(1):2. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.189. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21218552 No abstract available.
-
[Commentary to the article: Kaiser C, Galatius S, Erne P et al. Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries. N Engl J Med, 2010; 363: 2310-2319].Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(1):91-3. Kardiol Pol. 2011. PMID: 21267981 Polish. No abstract available.
-
Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries.N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 24;364(12):1179-80; author reply 1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1101051. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21428780 No abstract available.
-
Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries.N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 24;364(12):1179; author reply 1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1101051. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21428781 No abstract available.
-
Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries.N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 24;364(12):1179; author reply 1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1101051. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21428782 No abstract available.
-
Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries.N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 24;364(12):1178-9; author reply 1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1101051. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21428783 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources