The clinical impact of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on management of CNS anomalies in the second trimester of pregnancy
- PMID: 21080900
- DOI: 10.3109/00016349.2010.526184
The clinical impact of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on management of CNS anomalies in the second trimester of pregnancy
Abstract
Objectives: to evaluate the additional information of second trimester magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to ultrasound in fetuses with identified or suspected central nervous system (CNS) anomalies and to study the clinical impact of the information on pregnancy management.
Design: prospective study during 2004-2007. The fetal MRI examination was planned to be performed within 3 days after the ultrasound. Setting. Uppsala University hospital.
Material: twenty-nine pregnant women in whom second trimester ultrasound identified or suspected fetal CNS anomalies.
Main outcome measures: evaluation of the additional information gained from MRI and the consequence it had on pregnancy management.
Results: the mean interval between ultrasound and MRI was 1.6 days (range 0-7). In 16 fetuses (55%), MRI verified the ultrasound diagnosis but provided no additional information, while in 10 (35%) MRI gave additional information without changing the management. In 3 (10%), MRI provided additional information that changed the management of the pregnancy. Two of these women were obese.
Conclusions: fetal MRI in the second trimester might be a clinically valuable adjunct to ultrasound for the evaluation of CNS anomalies, especially when ultrasound is inconclusive due to maternal obesity.
Similar articles
-
Second trimester fetal magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnosis of non-central nervous system anomalies.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Apr;90(4):380-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01071.x. Epub 2011 Mar 4. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011. PMID: 21306331
-
[Evaluation of malformations of the fetal central nervous system using fetal MRI].Rofo. 2008 Aug;180(8):715-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027433. Epub 2008 May 16. Rofo. 2008. PMID: 18484515 German.
-
Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities.BJOG. 2004 Aug;111(8):784-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00149.x. BJOG. 2004. PMID: 15270925
-
Fetal central nervous system malformations on MR images.Brain Dev. 2009 Mar;31(3):185-99. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Aug 30. Brain Dev. 2009. PMID: 18762395 Review.
-
Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: a review.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;19(2):151-6. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32809bd978. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17353684 Review.
Cited by
-
Magnetic resonance imaging in the second trimester as a complement to ultrasound for diagnosis of fetal anomalies.Acta Radiol Open. 2024 May 11;13(5):20584601241248820. doi: 10.1177/20584601241248820. eCollection 2024 May. Acta Radiol Open. 2024. PMID: 38737558 Free PMC article.
-
Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging vs autopsy of second trimester fetuses terminated due to anomalies.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):865-876. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13548. Epub 2019 Mar 3. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019. PMID: 30694559 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero.Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun;27(6):2367-2380. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4563-4. Epub 2016 Sep 21. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27655301 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Plain Radiography in Assessing Aborted Foetal Musculoskeletal Anomalies in Everyday Practice.J Imaging. 2024 Sep 27;10(10):242. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10100242. J Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39452405 Free PMC article.
-
Prenatal findings and postnatal follow-up of a midline dural sinus malformation.Acta Radiol Open. 2021 Apr 7;10(4):20584601211006315. doi: 10.1177/20584601211006315. eCollection 2021 Apr. Acta Radiol Open. 2021. PMID: 33889426 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical