Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Jul;84(1003):612-20.
doi: 10.1259/bjr/74430952. Epub 2010 Nov 16.

Comparison of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy

H J Shin et al. Br J Radiol. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative accuracies of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in predicting residual tumour size and pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. Each prediction method was compared with the gold standard of surgical pathology.

Methods: 43 patients (age range, 25-62 years; mean age, 42.7 years) with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who had been treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled prospectively. We compared the predicted residual tumour size and the predicted response on imaging and clinical examination with residual tumour size and response on pathology. Statistical analysis was performed using weighted kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results: The ICC values between predicted tumour size and pathologically determined tumour size were 0.65 for clinical examination, 0.69 for mammography, 0.78 for sonography and 0.97 for MRI. Agreement between the response predictions at mid-treatment and the responses measured by pathology had kappa values of 0.28 for clinical examination, 0.32 for mammography, 0.46 for sonography and 0.68 for MRI. Agreement between the final response predictions and the responses measured by pathology had kappa values of 0.43 for clinical examination, 0.44 for mammography, 0.50 for sonography and 0.82 for MRI.

Conclusion: Predictions of response and residual tumour size made on MRI were better correlated with the assessments of response and residual tumour size made upon pathology than were predictions made on the basis of clinical examination, mammography or sonography. Thus, the evaluation of predicted response using MRI could provide a relatively sensitive early assessment of chemotherapy efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 30-year-old woman with a palpable lump in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast. (a) The initial mediolateral oblique mammogram shows an approximately 6 cm mass with pleomorphic calcifications (encircled) in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast. Serial follow-up mammograms after (b) four and (c) eight cycles of chemotherapy show the decreased size of the large malignant mass, but also show remaining pleomorphic calcifications with segmental distribution (arrows). This was considered to be a partial response. (d) The initial sonogram shows a 4.2 cm mass with calcifications in the right breast. Two serial follow-up sonograms after (e) four and (f) eight cycles of chemotherapy show that the size of the mass has decreased markedly, but a vague mass with calcifications remains (arrows). This was considered to be a partial response. (g) A maximum intensity projection image on the initial MRI shows an approximately 5 cm enhancing mass in the right breast. Two serial follow-up MRI images after (h) four and (i) eight cycles of chemotherapy show no residual enhancing lesion in the right breast. This was interpreted as complete response on MRI. Surgery confirmed a 0.1-cm ductal carcinoma in situ, which indicated a pathological complete response.

References

    1. Bonadonna G, Valagussa P. Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. Semin Oncol 1996;23:464–74 - PubMed
    1. Newman L, Buzdar A, Singletary S, Kuerer H, Buchholz T, Ames F, et al. A prospective trial of preoperative chemotherapy in resectable breast cancer: predictors of breast-conservation therapy feasibility. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:228–34 - PubMed
    1. Kuerer H, Singletary S, Buzdar A, Ames F, Valero V, Buchholz T, et al. Surgical conservation planning after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and operable stage III breast carcinoma. Am J Surg 2001;182:601–8 - PubMed
    1. Vlastos G, Mirza N, Lenert J, Hunt K, Ames F, Feig B, et al. The feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA breast carcinoma patients after tumour downstaging with induction chemotherapy. Cancer 2000;88:1417–24 - PubMed
    1. Booser D, Hortobagyi G. Treatment of locally advanced breast cancer. Semin Oncol 1992;19:278–85 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances