Research ethics II: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership
- PMID: 21081679
- DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0264)
Research ethics II: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership
Abstract
Purpose: In this series of articles--Research Ethics I, Research Ethics II, and Research Ethics III--the authors provide a comprehensive review of the 9 core domains for the responsible conduct of research (RCR) as articulated by the Office of Research Integrity. In Research Ethics II, the authors review the RCR domains of mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership.
Method: They relied on authoritative documents, both historical and contemporary, insightful commentary, and empirical research in order to identify current issues and controversies of potential interest to both faculty and students.
Conclusions: The authors close by urging readers to stay abreast of the manifold ethics issues facing today's community of scientists, policymakers, and research institutions, and to adhere to best practices as they evolve.
Similar articles
-
Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):S346-62. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263). Epub 2010 Nov 16. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011. PMID: 21081675 Review.
-
Research ethics I: Responsible conduct of research (RCR)--historical and contemporary issues pertaining to human and animal experimentation.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):S303-29. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0265). Epub 2010 Nov 16. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011. PMID: 21081677
-
The responsible conduct of bioethics research.Account Res. 2011 Mar;18(2):102-19. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.557302. Account Res. 2011. PMID: 21390874
-
Ethical and methodological standards for laboratory and medical biological rhythm research.Chronobiol Int. 2008 Nov;25(6):999-1016. doi: 10.1080/07420520802544530. Chronobiol Int. 2008. PMID: 19005901
-
Publication ethics.Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Oct;19(10):1011-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03086.x. Epub 2009 Jun 13. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009. PMID: 19619189 Review.
Cited by
-
The early career researcher collaboration mindset.Breathe (Sheff). 2022 Jun;18(2):220016. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0016-2022. Epub 2022 Aug 9. Breathe (Sheff). 2022. PMID: 36337131 Free PMC article.
-
Best practices in nutrition science to earn and keep the public's trust.Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Jan 1;109(1):225-243. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy337. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019. PMID: 30657846 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Best practices for allocating appropriate credit and responsibility to authors of multi-authored articles.Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 1;2:196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00196. eCollection 2011. Front Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21909330 Free PMC article.
-
The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications.Scientometrics. 2019;118(1):339-373. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2969-2. Epub 2018 Nov 29. Scientometrics. 2019. PMID: 30930504 Free PMC article.
-
The changing forms and expectations of peer review.Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Sep 20;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5. eCollection 2018. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018. PMID: 30250752 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources