Regenerative medicine in Europe: global competition and innovation governance
- PMID: 21082895
- DOI: 10.2217/rme.10.81
Regenerative medicine in Europe: global competition and innovation governance
Abstract
Leading European nations with strong biotech sectors, such as the UK and Germany, are investing heavily in regenerative medicine, seeking competitive advantage in this emerging sector. However, in the broader biopharmaceutical sector, the EU is outperformed by the USA on all metrics, reflecting longstanding problems: limited venture capital finance, a fragmented patent system, and relatively weak relations between academia and industry. The current global downturn has exacerbated these difficulties. The crisis comes at a time when the EU is reframing its approach to the governance of innovation and renewing its commitment to the goal of making Europe the leading player in the global knowledge economy. If the EU is to gain a competitive advantage in the regenerative medicine sector then it must coordinate a complex multilevel governance framework that encompasses the EU, member states and regional authorities. This article takes stock of Europe's current competitive position within the global bioeconomy, drawing on a variety of metrics in the three intersecting spheres of innovation governance: science, market and society. These data then provide a platform for reviewing the problems of innovation governance faced by the EU and the strategic choices that have to be confronted in the regenerative medicine sector.
Similar articles
-
Japanese firms broaden investment focus to early biotech.Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Aug;22(8):931-2. doi: 10.1038/nbt0804-931. Nat Biotechnol. 2004. PMID: 15286631 No abstract available.
-
Sumitomo buys Oxford finance.Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Apr;22(4):480. Nat Biotechnol. 2004. PMID: 15085808 No abstract available.
-
Public companies get creative in raising finance.Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Apr;28(4):301-2. doi: 10.1038/nbt0410-301. Nat Biotechnol. 2010. PMID: 20379161 No abstract available.
-
Public-private partnership models in France and in Europe.Therapie. 2006 Jul-Aug;61(4):325-34, 313-23. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2006059. Therapie. 2006. PMID: 17124948 Review. English, French.
-
Enabling Europe to innovate.Science. 2007 Jan 19;315(5810):344-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1131373. Science. 2007. PMID: 17234939 Review.
Cited by
-
Regenerative Medicine in South Korea: Bridging the Gap Between Authorization and Reimbursement.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Aug 30;9:737504. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.737504. eCollection 2021. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021. PMID: 34527662 Free PMC article.
-
Regulatory considerations in production of a cell therapy medicinal product in Europe to clinical research.Clin Exp Med. 2014 Feb;14(1):25-33. doi: 10.1007/s10238-012-0213-6. Epub 2012 Sep 27. Clin Exp Med. 2014. PMID: 23014774 Review.
-
State strategies of governance in biomedical innovation: aligning conceptual approaches for understanding 'Rising Powers' in the global context.Global Health. 2011 Feb 24;7:3. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-3. Global Health. 2011. PMID: 21349182 Free PMC article.
-
The speculative turn in IVF: egg freezing and the financialization of fertility.New Genet Soc. 2020 Jul 2;39(3):306-326. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2019.1709430. Epub 2020 Mar 18. New Genet Soc. 2020. PMID: 40677587 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources