Assessing specificity for immunogenicity assays
- PMID: 21083156
- DOI: 10.4155/bio.09.41
Assessing specificity for immunogenicity assays
Abstract
Developing sensitive and specific bioanalytical assays for measuring the immunogenicity of biological therapeutics has become an integral component of the drug-development process. The strategy for measuring these immune responses involves performing sensitive screening assays that are capable of detecting low levels of both low- and high-affinity antibodies. However, having sensitive assays inherently results in a certain rate of false-positivity. Hence, developing steps to determine specificity in these assays is important to confirm the presence of antidrug antibodies. The specificity assays are defined by the ability of an assay to score a positive result if the serum sample contains an antibody that can bind and/or neutralize the therapeutic protein. Here, we discuss the methodologies for determining specificity in the bioanalytical assays used for measuring antidrug antibodies. These methods will provide investigators and regulators with guidelines to develop and review assays to measure antidrug antibodies, which can specifically interfere with the actions of the drug and/or influence the safety profile of the therapeutic proteins.
Similar articles
-
Clinical immunogenicity specificity assessments: a platform evaluation.J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011 Feb 20;54(3):629-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2010.09.035. Epub 2010 Oct 29. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011. PMID: 21035975
-
Challenges in developing antidrug antibody screening assays.Bioanalysis. 2009 Jul;1(4):699-704. doi: 10.4155/bio.09.55. Bioanalysis. 2009. PMID: 21083131 Review.
-
Regulatory considerations for development of bioanalytical assays for biotechnology products.Bioanalysis. 2011 Mar;3(6):597-603. doi: 10.4155/bio.11.27. Bioanalysis. 2011. PMID: 21417729
-
Challenges in developing bioanalytical assays for characterization of antibody-drug conjugates.Bioanalysis. 2011 Mar;3(6):677-700. doi: 10.4155/bio.11.30. Bioanalysis. 2011. PMID: 21417735 Review.
-
Identification and inhibition of drug target interference in immunogenicity assays.J Immunol Methods. 2010 Apr 15;355(1-2):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.02.008. Epub 2010 Feb 24. J Immunol Methods. 2010. PMID: 20188106
Cited by
-
Summary of confirmation cut point discussions.AAPS J. 2011 Jun;13(2):227-9. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9263-z. Epub 2011 Mar 5. AAPS J. 2011. PMID: 21380610 Free PMC article.
-
Universal immunoassay applied during early development of large molecules to understand impact of immunogenicity on biotherapeutic exposure.AAPS J. 2012 Dec;14(4):843-9. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9403-0. Epub 2012 Sep 1. AAPS J. 2012. PMID: 22941399 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a method that eliminates false-positive results due to nerve growth factor interference in the assessment of fulranumab immunogenicity.AAPS J. 2014 May;16(3):464-77. doi: 10.1208/s12248-014-9581-z. Epub 2014 Mar 5. AAPS J. 2014. PMID: 24590506 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Statistical and bioanalytical considerations for establishing a depletion criterion for specificity testing during immunogenicity assessment of a biotherapeutic.AAPS J. 2013 Oct;15(4):1160-7. doi: 10.1208/s12248-013-9523-1. Epub 2013 Aug 30. AAPS J. 2013. PMID: 23990502 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical