Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;52(3):256-64.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02347.x. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

Delay discounting of reward in ADHD: application in young children

Affiliations

Delay discounting of reward in ADHD: application in young children

Vanessa B Wilson et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Background: A key underlying process that may contribute to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) involves alterations in reward evaluation, including assessing the relative value of immediate over delayed rewards. This study examines whether children with ADHD discount the value of delayed rewards to a greater degree than typically developing children using a delay discounting task.

Methods: Children aged 7-9 years diagnosed with ADHD and controls completed a task in which they chose between a hypothetical $10 available after a delay (7, 30, 90 and 180 days) versus various amounts available immediately.

Results: ADHD participants discounted more steeply than controls. However, this effect did not survive covarying of IQ.

Conclusions: ADHD is associated with a steeper delay gradient when contemplating hypothetical later rewards, but not independently of IQ. The interplay of cognitive processing and IQ with reward evaluation in ADHD requires further exploration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median indifference points for the ADHD and control children on the delay discounting task. Lines represent the hyperbolic functions fitted to these data points for each group with the fitted k and R2 values reported. *p ≤ 0.05 using a Mann-Whitney U test to test for differences in indifference points between groups at each delay.
Figure 2
Figure 2
WISC-IVFull Scale IQ as a function of ln(k). Lines represent the linear regression fitted to these data points for each group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean response times as a function of delay for questions that were “hard” (subjective value of both alternatives was almost equivalent by virtue of being close to the indifference point) or “easy” (subjective value of each alternative was different). *p < .05 using a paired samples t-test to compare response times for different question types at the same delay.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist. 2002;57:1060–1073. - PubMed
    1. Antrop I, Stock P, Verte S, Wiersema JR, Baeyens D, Roeyers H. ADHD and delay aversion: The influence of non-temporal stimulation on choice for delayed rewards. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2006;47:1152–1158. - PubMed
    1. Barkley RA. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin. 1997;121:65–94. - PubMed
    1. Barkley RA, Edwards G, Laneri M, Fletcher K, Metevia L. Executive functioning, temporal discounting, and sense of time in adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2001;29:541–546. - PubMed
    1. Bitsakou P, Psychogiou L, Thompson M, Sonuga-Barke EJ. Delay aversion in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: An empirical investigation of the broader phenotype. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:446–456. - PubMed

Publication types