Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jan 1;173(1):71-83.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq323. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

Mortality in the agricultural health study, 1993-2007

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Mortality in the agricultural health study, 1993-2007

Jenna K Waggoner et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Comparing agricultural cohorts with the general population is challenging because the general healthiness of farmers may mask potential adverse health effects of farming. Using data from the Agricultural Health Study, a cohort of 89,656 pesticide applicators and their spouses (N = 89, 656) in North Carolina and Iowa, the authors computed standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) comparing deaths from time of the enrollment (1993-1997) through 2007 to state-specific rates. To compensate for the cohort's overall healthiness, relative SMRs were estimated by calculating the SMR for each cause relative to the SMR for all other causes. In 1,198,129 person-years of follow-up, 6,419 deaths were observed. The all-cause mortality rate was less than expected (SMR(applicators) = 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52, 0.55; SMR(spouses) = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.55). SMRs for all cancers, heart disease, and diabetes were significantly below 1.0. In contrast, applicators experienced elevated numbers of machine-related deaths (SMR = 4.15, 95% CI: 3.18, 5.31), motor vehicle nontraffic accidents (SMR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.81, 4.14), and collisions with objects (SMR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.25, 3.34). In the relative SMR analysis for applicators, the relative mortality ratio was elevated for lymphohematopoietic cancers, melanoma, and digestive system, prostate, kidney, and brain cancers. Among spouses, relative SMRs exceeded 1.0 for lymphohematopoietic cancers and malignancies of the digestive system, brain, breast, and ovary. Unintentional fatal injuries remain an important risk for farmers; mortality ratios from several cancers were elevated relative to other causes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blair A, Sandler DP, Tarone R, et al. Mortality among participants in the Agricultural Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15(4):279–285. - PubMed
    1. Blair A, Zahm SH. Cancer among farmers. Occup Med. 1991;6(3):335–354. - PubMed
    1. Blair A, Zahm SH, Pearce NE, et al. Clues to cancer etiology from studies of farmers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1992;18(4):209–215. - PubMed
    1. Cerhan JR, Cantor KP, Williamson K, et al. Cancer mortality among Iowa farmers: recent results, time trends, and lifestyle factors (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 1998;9(3):311–319. - PubMed
    1. Fleming LE, Bean JA, Rudolph M, et al. Mortality in a cohort of licensed pesticide applicators in Florida. Occup Environ Med. 1999;56(1):14–21. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types