Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;300(2):C328-37.
doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00383.2010. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

Antagonist action of progesterone at σ-receptors in the modulation of voltage-gated sodium channels

Affiliations

Antagonist action of progesterone at σ-receptors in the modulation of voltage-gated sodium channels

Molly Johannessen et al. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011 Feb.

Erratum in

  • Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2013 Nov 1;305(9):C997

Abstract

σ-Receptors are integral membrane proteins that have been implicated in a number of biological functions, many of which involve the modulation of ion channels. A wide range of synthetic ligands activate σ-receptors, but endogenous σ-receptor ligands have proven elusive. One endogenous ligand, dimethyltryptamine (DMT), has been shown to act as a σ-receptor agonist. Progesterone and other steroids bind σ-receptors, but the functional consequences of these interactions are unclear. Here we investigated progesterone binding to σ(1)- and σ(2)-receptors and evaluated its effect on σ-receptor-mediated modulation of voltage-gated Na(+) channels. Progesterone binds both σ-receptor subtypes in liver membranes with comparable affinities and blocks photolabeling of both subtypes in human embryonic kidney 293 cells that stably express the human cardiac Na(+) channel Na(v)1.5. Patch-clamp recording in this cell line tested Na(+) current modulation by the σ-receptor ligands ditolylguanidine, PB28, (+)SKF10047, and DMT. Progesterone inhibited the action of these ligands to varying degrees, and some of these actions were reduced by σ(1)-receptor knockdown with small interfering RNA. Progesterone inhibition of channel modulation by drugs was consistent with stronger antagonism of σ(2)-receptors. By contrast, progesterone inhibition of channel modulation by DMT was consistent with stronger antagonism of σ(1)-receptors. Progesterone binding to σ-receptors blocks σ-receptor-mediated modulation of a voltage-gated ion channel, and this novel membrane action of progesterone may be relevant to changes in brain and cardiovascular function during endocrine transitions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Progesterone binding to σ-receptors. A: radioligand binding curves demonstrating the competitive displacement by progesterone of ligand binding to σ1- and σ2-receptors. (+)[3H]-pentazocine was used as a ligand for σ1-receptors. [3H]ditolylguanidine ([3H]DTG) with cold (+)pentazocine (μM) was used to resolve σ2-receptors. The binding affinity of progesterone was determined to be 239 nM for σ1-receptors and 441 nM for σ2-receptors. B: σ-Receptor photolabeling with the σ12-receptor photolabel 1-N-(2′,6′-dimethyl-morpholino)-3-(4-azido-3-[125I]iodo-phenyl)propane ([125I]IAF) indicated that σ1- and σ2-receptors are expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells. The first lane represents HEK293 cell homogenates alone [control (Cont)], the second in 10 μM (+)pentazocine (Pent), the third in 20 μM DTG, and the fourth in 50 μM progesterone (Prog).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Progesterone actions on Na+ channel inhibition by σ-receptor ligands in HEK293 cells. Na+ currents evoked by voltage steps from −80 mV to −10 mV before and after addition of 10 μM DTG, 10 μM PB28, and 100 μM (+)SKF10047. A and B: current inhibition by σ-receptor ligands in the absence of progesterone (A) and in the presence of 10 μM progesterone (B).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Progesterone actions on Na+ channel inhibition by σ-receptor ligands in HEK293 cells with σ1-receptor small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown. A and B: Na+ currents evoked by voltage steps from −80 mV to −10 mV recorded from HEK293 cells transfected with sig1RsiRNA in the absence and presence of 10 μM DTG, 10 μM PB28, and 100 μM (+)SKF10047 before (A) and after (B) the addition of 10 μM progesterone.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Comparison of Na+ current inhibition with and without progesterone in control HEK293 cells and HEK293 cells with σ1-receptor siRNA knockdown. Average inhibition of each ligand was determined from current traces such as shown in Figs. 2 and 3. C, control; P, 10 μM progesterone. Bars represent means ± SE for n = 4–7. The values for DTG and PB28 differ significantly in both control HEK293 cells and with the addition of sig1RsiRNA, between recordings with and without 10 μM progesterone (*P < 0.005).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Progesterone actions on Na+ current inhibition by N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in HEK293 cells. A and B: Na+ currents evoked by voltage steps from −80 mV to −10 mV recorded from control HEK293 cells (A) and cells with reduced σ1-receptor expression (B) by transfection with sig1RsiRNA in the absence and presence of 100 μM DMT before and after the addition of 10 μM progesterone. C: average Na+ current inhibition by DMT in each condition. Bars represent means ± SE for n = 5–7. The percent inhibition differs significantly in control HEK293 cells between recordings with and without 10 μM progesterone (*P < 0.005).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Concentration dependence of σ-receptor antagonism by progesterone in HEK293 cells. Na+ current evoked by voltage steps from −80 mV to −10 mV, before and after addition of the indicated concentration of agonist, in the presence of various concentrations of progesterone. Peak current was normalized to control and plotted versus drug concentration. The horizontal lines indicate Na+ current inhibition by agonist in the absence of progesterone. Data points represent means ± SE for n = 5–7 cells. Curves represent best fits to the data using the single-site saturation equation given in methods. Half-maximal inhibition (IC50) values were 105, 380, 620, and 0.3 nM for DTG, PB28, DMT, and (+)SKF10047, respectively.

References

    1. Aydar E, Palmer CP, Klyachko VA, Jackson MB. The sigma receptor as a ligand-regulated auxiliary potassium channel subunit. Neuron 34: 399–410, 2002 - PubMed
    1. Becker JB, Rudick CN. Rapid effects of estrogen or progesterone on the amphetamine-induced increase in striatal dopamine are enhanced by estrogen priming: a microdialysis study. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64: 53–57, 1999 - PubMed
    1. Berardi F, Ferorelli S, Abate C, Colabufo NA, Contino M, Perrone R, Tortorella V. 4-(Tetralin-1-yl)- and 4-(naphthalen-1-yl)alkyl derivatives of 1-cyclohexylpiperazine as sigma receptor ligands with agonist sigma2 activity. J Med Chem 47: 2308–2317, 2004 - PubMed
    1. Bergeron R, de Montigny C, Debonnel G. Potentiation of neuronal NMDA response induced by dehydroepiandrosterone and its suppression by progesterone: effects mediated via sigma receptors. J Neurosci 16: 1193–1202, 1996 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowen WD. Sigma receptors: recent advances and new clinical potentials. Pharm Acta Helv 74: 211–218, 2000 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources