Pivot task increases knee frontal plane loading compared with sidestep and drop-jump

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess kinematic and kinetic differences between three tasks (drop-jump, sidestep cutting, and pivot tasks) commonly used to evaluate anterior cruciate ligament risk factors. Nineteen female collegiate soccer athletes from a Division I institution participated in this study. Participants performed a drop-jump task, and two unanticipated tasks, sidestep cutting and pivot. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to assess differences in the kinematic and kinetic parameters between tasks. The pivot task had lower knee flexion (-41.2 ± 8.8°) and a higher valgus angle (-7.6 ± 10.1°) than the sidestep (-53.9 ± 9.4° and -2.9 ± 10.0°, respectively) at maximum vertical ground reaction force. The pivot task (0.8 ± 0.3 multiples of body weight) had higher peak posterior ground reaction force than the drop-jump (0.3 ± 0.06 multiples of body weight) and sidestep cutting (0.3 ± 0.1 multiples of body weight), as well as higher internal varus moments (0.72 ± 0.3 N · m/kg · m) than the drop-jump (0.14 ± 0.07 N · m/kg · m) and sidestep (0.17 ± 0.5 N · m/kg · m) at peak stance. During the pivot task, the athletes presented a more erect posture and adopted strategies that may place higher loads on the knee joint and increase the strain on the anterior cruciate ligament.

Figure 1

Example of the unanticipated scenario projected onto a screen to mimic a soccer game situation.

Figure 2

Knee varus–valgus moment during the stance phase of three tasks: drop-jump, sidestep, and pivot tasks.

Figure 3

Posterior ground reaction force during the three landing tasks measured in multiples of body weight while performing three tasks: drop-jump, sidestep, and pivot.

Figure 4

Knee flexion angle during the stance phase of three tasks: drop-jump, sidestep, and pivot tasks.

Figure 5

Knee valgus angle during the stance phase of three tasks: drop-jump, sidestep, and pivot tasks.