Comparison of induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone in term primigravidae
- PMID: 21087166
- DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2010.531798
Comparison of induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone in term primigravidae
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and complications of intravaginal misoprostol application before starting oxytocin infusion with oxytocin infusion alone for labor induction in term primigravidae pregnancies with low-Bishop score.
Methods: This randomized study included 101 primigravidae women with singleton pregnancies >38 weeks and a Bishop score of <6. Group 1 (50 patients) received a 50-μg dose of intravaginal misoprostol, with an oxytocin infusion started 3 h later. Group 2 (51 patients) received only an oxytocin infusion for labor induction. The time from induction to delivery, the route of delivery and complications were analyzed.
Results: The mean time from induction to delivery was 10.4 ± 2.1 h in Group 1 and 13.7 ± 3.4 in Group 2 (p < 0.001). The rates of vaginal delivery, Apgar scores at 1st and 5th min, placental abruption, and postpartum hemorrhage were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: Intravaginal application of 50-μg misoprostol before starting oxytocin infusion is a more effective method of labor induction than oxytocin infusion alone in term primigravidae pregnant women with low-Bishop scores.
Similar articles
-
Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Dec;129(2):140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.040. Epub 2006 Jan 6. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006. PMID: 16406221 Clinical Trial.
-
Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jul;110(1):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Mar 26. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010. PMID: 20347088 Clinical Trial.
-
Induction of labor in great grandmultipara with misoprostol.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 May 1;126(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.012. Epub 2005 Aug 29. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006. PMID: 16129547 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a meta-analysis.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(8):1297-307. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1046828. Epub 2015 Jun 11. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016. PMID: 26067262 Review.
-
How to avoid iatrogenic morbidity and mortality while increasing availability of oxytocin and misoprostol for PPH prevention?Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Dec;103(3):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Oct 26. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008. PMID: 18954869 Review.
Cited by
-
Challenges and Limitations of Clinical Trials on Labor Induction: A Review of the Literature.AJP Rep. 2018 Oct;8(4):e365-e378. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676577. Epub 2018 Dec 26. AJP Rep. 2018. PMID: 30591843 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;2010(10):CD000941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000941.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. PMID: 20927722 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 27;19(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2454-9. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 31455215 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical