Height contributes to the gender difference in wait-list mortality under the MELD-based liver allocation system
- PMID: 21087414
- PMCID: PMC3059496
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03326.x
Height contributes to the gender difference in wait-list mortality under the MELD-based liver allocation system
Abstract
This study examined factors associated with the gender disparity in wait-list mortality in the MELD era. Adult patients listed for liver transplantation from 2002 to 2008 were included. Females [12 585(36%)] and males [22 126(64%)] differed clinically by age (54 vs. 52 years), height (1.6 vs. 1.8 m), listing estimated glomerular filtration rate [(eGFR); 70 vs. 83 mL/min] and cirrhosis etiology. Holding MELD constant, females were at 19% (95% CI, 1.13-1.25, p < 0.001) higher risk of wait-list mortality than males under the current allocation system. The relative hazard increased with worsening renal function, whether measured by serum creatinine or eGFR. Adjustment for MELD, age, African-American race, cirrhosis etiology, region and ABO group attenuated this relative hazard (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22; p < 0.001) but additional adjustment for height completely explained this gender disparity in wait-list mortality (HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98-1.12; p = 0.2). Transplantation rates, however, remained lower among females, even after adjustment for height (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.92; p < 0.001). In conclusion, under the current liver allocation system, women have a 19% increased risk of wait-list mortality compared to men with the same MELD scores. Height contributes to this gender disparity, possibly reflecting differences in transplantation rates for shorter individuals.
©2010 The Authors Journal compilation©2010 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
Figures





Similar articles
-
MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era.Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1887-1895.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.050. Epub 2021 Sep 3. Gastroenterology. 2021. PMID: 34481845 Free PMC article.
-
Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):e201129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1129. Epub 2020 Jul 15. JAMA Surg. 2020. PMID: 32432699 Free PMC article.
-
Gender, renal function, and outcomes on the liver transplant waiting list: assessment of revised MELD including estimated glomerular filtration rate.J Hepatol. 2011 Mar;54(3):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Sep 19. J Hepatol. 2011. PMID: 21109324
-
Factors that affect deceased donor liver transplantation rates in the United States in addition to the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score.Liver Transpl. 2012 Dec;18(12):1456-63. doi: 10.1002/lt.23548. Liver Transpl. 2012. PMID: 22965903 Free PMC article.
-
Sex Differences in Heart Transplantation: Evolving Trends and Insights.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jul 12;27(1):112. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02266-z. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40650852 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Sex and Size Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.JAMA Surg. 2024 Nov 1;159(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3498. JAMA Surg. 2024. PMID: 39230915 Free PMC article.
-
Mortality and Causes of Death After Liver Transplantation: Analysis of Sex Differences in a Large Nationwide Cohort.Transpl Int. 2022 May 9;35:10263. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10263. eCollection 2022. Transpl Int. 2022. PMID: 35615539 Free PMC article.
-
Practical Considerations When Choosing Chemoembolization versus Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024 Mar 14;41(1):48-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1779714. eCollection 2024 Feb. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38495267 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sex Differences in Excess Mortality Among Waitlisted Kidney, Heart, and Liver Transplant Candidates.Transplant Direct. 2025 Aug 22;11(9):e1856. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001856. eCollection 2025 Sep. Transplant Direct. 2025. PMID: 40862214 Free PMC article.
-
Gender disparities in transplantation.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2021 Oct 1;26(5):513-520. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000909. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2021. PMID: 34343154 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Freeman RB, Jr., Wiesner RH, Harper A, McDiarmid SV, Lake J, Edwards E, et al. The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transpl. 2002 Sep;8(9):851–8. - PubMed
-
- Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J, ter Borg PC. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000 Apr;31(4):864–71. - PubMed
-
- Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, Kremers W, Therneau TM, Kosberg CL, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001 Feb;33(2):464–70. - PubMed
-
- Wiesner RH, McDiarmid SV, Kamath PS, Edwards EB, Malinchoc M, Kremers WK, et al. MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transpl. 2001 Jul;7(7):567–80. - PubMed
-
- Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, Harper A, Kim R, Kamath P, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology. 2003 Jan;124(1):91–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous