[Disinfectants for the skin of premature]
- PMID: 21090087
[Disinfectants for the skin of premature]
Abstract
Nosocomial infections are among the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in neonatal intensive care units. Prevention of healthcare-associated infections is based on strategies that aim to limit susceptibility to infections by enhancing host defences, interrupting trasmission of organisms by healthcare workers and by promoting the judicious use of antimicrobials. Strategies for the prevention of nosocomial infections include hand hygiene practices, prevention of central venous (cvc)-related bloodstream infections, judicious use of antimicrobials for therapy, enhancement of host defences, skin care and early enteral feeding with human milk. Major concerns about the use of alcoholic chlorhexidine are for the high risk of skin burns in extremely premature infants during the first days of life, when the skin is thin and not fully keratinesed. Aqueous chlorhexidine could be less irritant when used in very low birthweigth infants and thus could represent a good option. A recent prospective trial of adult patients showed similar effectiveness of alcoholic and aqueos solutions of chlorexidine. However, to date no study evaluated whether the aqueos formulation is less harmful and as effective as the alcoholic formulation in neonatal infants. The lack of evidence for neonatal patients prompts urgent need for large randomised controlled trials comparing effectiveness and safety of different skin disinfectants before CVC placement in neonates and particulary in very low birth-weight infants. Nosocomial infections are still of the most serious problems for the neonatal intensive care unit. Therefore every effort must be implemented to reduce the incidence of these infections, can not be considered a toll required hospitalization, as it may not be acceptable for a place of shelter and care as the hospital may itself be a source of disease.
Similar articles
-
Strategies for the prevention of hospital-acquired infections in the neonatal intensive care unit.J Hosp Infect. 2008 Apr;68(4):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Mar 7. J Hosp Infect. 2008. PMID: 18329134 Review.
-
2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol versus 10% povidone-iodine for insertion site cleaning before central line insertion in preterm infants: a randomised trial.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Mar;103(2):F101-F106. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312193. Epub 2017 Oct 26. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018. PMID: 29074717 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates.Pediatrics. 2001 Jun;107(6):1431-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.6.1431. Pediatrics. 2001. PMID: 11389271 Clinical Trial.
-
Chlorhexidine bathing in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit: impact on central line-associated bloodstream infections.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):158-63. doi: 10.1086/674862. Epub 2013 Dec 24. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 24442078
-
Evaluation of Antiseptic Use in Pediatric Surgical Units in the United Kingdom-Where Is the Evidence Base?Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Aug;26(4):309-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1559883. Epub 2015 Sep 17. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016. PMID: 26378485 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical