Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting
- PMID: 21090906
- DOI: 10.1037/a0021324
Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting
Abstract
Selectively retrieving a subset of previously studied information enhances memory for the retrieved information but causes forgetting of related, nonretrieved information. Such retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) has often been attributed to inhibitory executive-control processes that supposedly suppress the nonretrieved items' memory representation. Here, we examined the role of working memory capacity (WMC) in young adults' RIF. WMC was assessed by means of the operation span task. Results revealed a positive relationship between WMC and RIF, with high-WMC individuals showing more RIF than low-WMC individuals. In contrast, individuals showed enhanced memory for retrieved information regardless of WMC. The results are consistent with previous individual-differences work that suggests a close link between WMC and inhibitory efficiency. In particular, the finding supports the inhibitory executive-control account of RIF.
Similar articles
-
Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Nov;33(6):1020-34. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1020. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007. PMID: 17983310
-
Retrieval-practice task affects relationship between working memory capacity and retrieval-induced forgetting.Memory. 2016 Nov;24(10):1407-18. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1117640. Epub 2015 Dec 7. Memory. 2016. PMID: 26642868 Clinical Trial.
-
The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: an individual differences analysis of immediate free recall.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):240-7. doi: 10.1037/a0017739. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20053060
-
[Functioning of memory in subjects with autism].Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):550-6. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.10.010. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Encephale. 2008. PMID: 19081450 Review. French.
-
A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1282-1311. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1220-5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 28108977 Review.
Cited by
-
Retrieval Practice Enhances New Learning but does Not Affect Performance in Subsequent Arithmetic Tasks.J Cogn. 2022 Mar 22;5(1):22. doi: 10.5334/joc.216. eCollection 2022. J Cogn. 2022. PMID: 36072090 Free PMC article.
-
A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting.Mem Cognit. 2012 Aug;40(6):827-43. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0211-7. Mem Cognit. 2012. PMID: 22552992
-
What Do We Really Know about Cognitive Inhibition? Task Demands and Inhibitory Effects across a Range of Memory and Behavioural Tasks.PLoS One. 2015 Aug 13;10(8):e0134951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134951. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26270470 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prefrontal dopamine and the dynamic control of human long-term memory.Transl Psychiatry. 2011 Jul 5;1(7):e15. doi: 10.1038/tp.2011.15. Transl Psychiatry. 2011. PMID: 22832518 Free PMC article.
-
The Forward Testing Effect is Reliable and Independent of Learners' Working Memory Capacity.J Cogn. 2019 Aug 29;2(1):37. doi: 10.5334/joc.82. J Cogn. 2019. PMID: 31517247 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical